"It just happens": a qualitative study exploring low-income women's perspectives on pregnancy intention and planning
- PMID: 25477272
- PMCID: PMC4303515
- DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.09.014
"It just happens": a qualitative study exploring low-income women's perspectives on pregnancy intention and planning
Abstract
Objective: Unintended pregnancy is common and disproportionately occurs among low-income women. We conducted a qualitative study with low-income women to better typologize pregnancy intention, understand the relationship between pregnancy intention and contraceptive use, and identify the contextual factors that shape pregnancy intention and contraceptive behavior.
Study design: Semistructured interviews were conducted with low-income, African-American and white women aged 18-45 recruited from reproductive health clinics in Pittsburgh, PA, to explore factors that influence women's pregnancy-related behaviors. Narratives were analyzed using content analysis and the constant comparison method.
Results: Among the 66 participants (36 African-American and 30 white), we identified several factors that may impede our public health goal of increasing the proportion of pregnancies that are consciously desired and planned. First, women do not always perceive that they have reproductive control and therefore do not necessarily formulate clear pregnancy intentions. Second, the benefits of a planned pregnancy may not be evident. Third, because preconception intention and planning do not necessarily occur, decisions about the acceptability of a pregnancy are often determined after the pregnancy has already occurred. Finally, even when women express a desire to avoid pregnancy, their contraceptive behaviors are not necessarily congruent with their desires. We also identified several clinically relevant and potentially modifiable factors that help to explain this intention-behavior discrepancy, including women's perceptions of low fecundity and their experiences with male partner contraceptive sabotage.
Conclusion: Our findings suggest that the current conceptual framework that views pregnancy-related behaviors from a strict planned behavior perspective may be limited, particularly among low-income populations.
Implications: This study identified several cognitive and interpersonal pathways to unintended pregnancy among low-income women in Pittsburgh, PA, including perceptions of low reproductive control, perceptions of low fecundity and male partner reproductive coercion.
Keywords: Pregnancy intention; Pregnancy planning; Race; Reproductive coercion.
Published by Elsevier Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
Race and reproductive coercion: a qualitative assessment.Womens Health Issues. 2015 May-Jun;25(3):216-23. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.12.004. Epub 2015 Mar 5. Womens Health Issues. 2015. PMID: 25748823 Free PMC article.
-
Racial Differences in Pregnancy Intention, Reproductive Coercion, and Partner Violence among Family Planning Clients: A Qualitative Exploration.Womens Health Issues. 2018 May-Jun;28(3):205-211. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2018.02.003. Epub 2018 Apr 7. Womens Health Issues. 2018. PMID: 29631975 Free PMC article.
-
Women's and girls' experiences of reproductive coercion and opportunities for intervention in family planning clinics in Nairobi, Kenya: a qualitative study.Reprod Health. 2020 Jun 17;17(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12978-020-00942-7. Reprod Health. 2020. PMID: 32552745 Free PMC article.
-
Understanding U.S. fertility: continuity and change in the National Survey of Family Growth, 1988-1995.Fam Plann Perspect. 1996 Jan-Feb;28(1):4-12. Fam Plann Perspect. 1996. PMID: 8822409 Review.
-
Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 1 of 4).J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Oct;37(10):936-42. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30033-0. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015. PMID: 26606712 English, French.
Cited by
-
Evaluating the implementation of the Reproductive Life Plan in disadvantaged communities: A mixed-methods study using the i-PARIHS framework.PLoS One. 2020 Sep 11;15(9):e0236712. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236712. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 32915798 Free PMC article.
-
Some key questions: Pregnancy intention screening by community health workers.Womens Health (Lond). 2023 Jan-Dec;19:17455057231213735. doi: 10.1177/17455057231213735. Womens Health (Lond). 2023. PMID: 38105749 Free PMC article.
-
The Association between Mental Health Disorders and History of Unintended Pregnancy among Women Veterans.J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Dec;33(12):2092-2099. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4647-8. Epub 2018 Sep 5. J Gen Intern Med. 2018. PMID: 30187377 Free PMC article.
-
Associations between Pregnancy Intention, Attitudes, and Contraceptive Use among Women Veterans in the ECUUN Study.Womens Health Issues. 2018 Nov-Dec;28(6):480-487. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2018.07.004. Epub 2018 Sep 18. Womens Health Issues. 2018. PMID: 30241794 Free PMC article.
-
Reproductive Life Planning and Patient-Centered Care: Can the Inconsistencies be Reconciled?Matern Child Health J. 2019 Jul;23(7):869-870. doi: 10.1007/s10995-019-02734-3. Matern Child Health J. 2019. PMID: 31152282 No abstract available.
References
-
- Brown S, Eisenberg L. The best Intentions: Unintended pregnancy and the well-being of children and families. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press; 1995. - PubMed
-
- Cheng D, Schwarz EB, Douglas E, Horon I. Unintended pregnancy and associated maternal preconception, prenatal and postpartum behaviors. Contraception. 2009 Mar;79(3):194–198. - PubMed
-
- Gipson JD, Koenig MA, Hindin MJ. The effects of unintended pregnancy on infant, child, and parental health: a review of the literature. Studies in family planning. 2008 Mar;39(1):18–38. - PubMed
-
- Wulf D, Donovan P. Women and societies benefit when childbearing is planned. Issues Brief (Alan Guttmacher Inst) 2002 Apr;(3):1–4. - PubMed