Differences in Biases and Compensatory Strategies Across Discipline, Rank, and Gender Among University Academics
- PMID: 25479960
- PMCID: PMC4458235
- DOI: 10.1007/s11948-014-9615-z
Differences in Biases and Compensatory Strategies Across Discipline, Rank, and Gender Among University Academics
Abstract
The study of ethical behavior and ethical decision making is of increasing importance in many fields, and there is a growing literature addressing the issue. However, research examining differences in ethical decision making across fields and levels of experience is limited. In the present study, biases that undermine ethical decision making and compensatory strategies that may aid ethical decision making were identified in a series of interviews with 63 faculty members across six academic fields (e.g., biological sciences, health sciences, social sciences) and three levels of rank (assistant professor, associate professor, and full professor) as well as across gender. The degree to which certain biases and compensatory strategies were used in justifications for responses to ethical situations was compared across fields, level of experience, and gender. Major differences were found across fields for several biases and compensatory strategies, including biases and compensatory strategies related to use of professional field principles and field-specific guidelines. Furthermore, full professors tend to differ greatly from assistant and associate professors on a number of constructs, and there were differences in the consistency with which biases and compensatory strategies were displayed within these various groups. Implications of these findings for ethics training and future research are discussed.
Keywords: Biases; Compensatory strategies; Cross-field; Cross-rank; Ethical decision making; Ethics.
References
-
- Allen JG, Haccoun DM. Sex differences in emotionality: A multidimensional approach. Human Relations. 1976;29(8):711–722.
-
- Anker R. Gender and jobs: Sex segregation of occupations in the world. Geneva: International Labour Office; 1998.
-
- Baer M, Frese M. Innovation is not enough: Climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2003;24:45–68.
-
- Barnett JH, Karson MJ. Managers, values, and executive decisions: An exploration of the role of gender, career stage, organizational level, function, and the importance of ethics, relationships and results in managerial decision-making. Journal of Business Ethics. 1989;8(10):747–771.
-
- Bertrand M, Goldin C, Katz LF. Dynamics of the gender gap for young professionals in the financial and corporate sectors. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics. 2010:228–255.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
