Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jan;30 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S3-6.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-3062-z.

How bioethics principles can aid design of electronic health records to accommodate patient granular control

Affiliations

How bioethics principles can aid design of electronic health records to accommodate patient granular control

Eric M Meslin et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Jan.

Abstract

Ethics should guide the design of electronic health records (EHR), and recognized principles of bioethics can play an important role. This approach was recently adopted by a team of informaticists who are designing and testing a system where patients exert granular control over who views their personal health information. While this method of building ethics in from the start of the design process has significant benefits, questions remain about how useful the application of bioethics principles can be in this process, especially when principles conflict. For instance, while the ethical principle of respect for autonomy supports a robust system of granular control, the principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence counsel restraint due to the danger of patients being harmed by restrictions on provider access to data. Conflict between principles has long been recognized by ethicists and has even motivated attacks on approaches that state and apply principles. In this paper, we show how using ethical principles can help in the design of EHRs by first explaining how ethical principles can and should be used generally, and then by discussing how attention to details in specific cases can show that the tension between principles is not as bad as it initially appeared. We conclude by suggesting ways in which the application of these (and other) principles can add value to the ongoing discussion of patient involvement in their health care. This is a new approach to linking principles to informatics design that we expect will stimulate further interest.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Spriggs M, Arnold MV, Pearce CM, et al. Ethical questions must be considered for electronic health records. J Med Ethics. 2012;38:535–539. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100413. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Caine K, Hanania R. Patients want granular privacy control over health information in electronic medical records. J Am Med Informatics Soc. 2013;20:7–15. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001023. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Al-Ubaydli M. Patients must have control of their medical records. BMJ. 2012;345 - PubMed
    1. Doctors Helping Doctors. Clinician Perspectives on Electronic Health Information Sharing for Transitions of Care. October 2012. https://www.acponline.org/running_practice/technology/bpc_clinician_surv... (Accessed September 24 2014)
    1. Gunter T, Terry N. The Emergence of National Electronic Health Record Architectures in the United States and Australia: Models, Costs, and Questions. Med Internet Res. 2005;7(1):e3. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7.1.e3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms