Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015;29(8):1456-65.
doi: 10.1080/02699931.2014.985188. Epub 2014 Dec 8.

The role of current affect, anticipated affect and spontaneous self-affirmation in decisions to receive self-threatening genetic risk information

Affiliations

The role of current affect, anticipated affect and spontaneous self-affirmation in decisions to receive self-threatening genetic risk information

Rebecca A Ferrer et al. Cogn Emot. 2015.

Abstract

One reason for not seeking personally threatening information may be negative current and anticipated affective responses. We examined whether current (e.g., worry) and anticipated negative affect predicted intentions to seek sequencing results in the context of an actual genomic sequencing trial (ClinSeq®; n = 545) and whether spontaneous self-affirmation mitigated any (negative) association between affect and intentions. Anticipated affective response negatively predicted intentions to obtain and share results pertaining to both medically actionable and non-actionable disease, whereas current affect was only a marginal predictor. The negative association between anticipated affect and intentions to obtain results pertaining to non-actionable disease was weaker in individuals who were higher in spontaneous self-affirmation. These results have implications for the understanding of current and anticipated affect, self-affirmation and consequential decision-making and contribute to a growing body of evidence on the role of affect in medical decisions.

Keywords: Anticipated affect; Current affect; Defensiveness; Information avoidance; Information seeking; Self-affirmation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aspinwall LG, Taber JM, Kohlmann W, Leachman SA. Psychological aspects of hereditary cancer risk counseling and genetic testing. In: Carr BI, Steel J, editors. Psychological aspects of cancer. New York, NY: Springer; 2013. pp. 31–64.
    1. Biesecker LG, Mullikin JC, Facio FM, Turner C, Cherukuri PF, Blakesley RW, Green ED. The ClinSeq Project: Piloting large-scale genome sequencing for research in genomic medicine. Genome Research. 2009;19:1665–1674. doi: 10.1101/gr.092841.109. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chapman GB, Coups EJ. Emotions and preventive health behavior: Worry, regret, and influenza vaccination. Health Psychology. 2006;25:82–90. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.25.1.82. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cohen GL, Sherman DK. The psychology of change: Self-affirmation and social psychological intervention. Annual Review of Psychology. 2014;65:333–371. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115137. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Correll J, Spencer SJ, Zanna MP. An affirmed self and an open mind: Self-affirmation and sensitivity to argument strength. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2004;40:350–356.