Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2014;10(12):3455-65.
doi: 10.4161/hv.36117.

Comparative humoral and cellular immunogenicity and safety of human papillomavirus (HPV)-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine and HPV-6/11/16/18 vaccine in healthy women aged 18-45 years: follow-up through Month 48 in a Phase III randomized study

Collaborators, Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Comparative humoral and cellular immunogenicity and safety of human papillomavirus (HPV)-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine and HPV-6/11/16/18 vaccine in healthy women aged 18-45 years: follow-up through Month 48 in a Phase III randomized study

Mark H Einstein et al. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2014.

Abstract

We previously reported higher anti-HPV-16 and -18 immune responses induced by HPV-16/18 vaccine compared with HPV-6/11/16/18 vaccine at Month 7 (one month after completion of full vaccination series) in women aged 18-45 y in an observer-blind study NCT00423046; the differences of immune response magnitudes were maintained up to Month 24. Here we report follow-up data through Month 48. At Month 48, in according-to-protocol cohort for immunogenicity (seronegative and DNA-negative for HPV type analyzed at baseline), geometric mean titers of serum neutralizing antibodies were 2.0- to 5.2-fold higher (HPV-16) and 8.6- to 12.8-fold higher (HPV-18) in HPV-16/18 vaccine group than in HPV-6/11/16/18 vaccine group. The majority of women in both vaccine groups remained seropositive for HPV-16. The same trend was observed for HPV-18 in HPV-16/18 vaccine group; however, seropositivity rates in HPV-6/11/16/18 vaccine group decreased considerably, particularly in the older age groups. In the total vaccinated cohort (regardless of baseline serological and HPV-DNA status), anti-HPV-16 and -18 neutralizing antibody levels induced by HPV-16/18 vaccine were higher than those induced by HPV-6/11/16/18 vaccine. CD4+ T-cell response for HPV-16 and HPV-18 was higher in HPV-16/18 vaccine group than in HPV-6/11/16/18 vaccine group. Memory B-cell responses appeared similar between vaccine groups. Both vaccines were generally well tolerated. Overall, the higher immune response observed with the HPV-16/18 vaccine was maintained up to Month 48. A head-to-head study incorporating clinical endpoints would be required to confirm whether the observed differences in immune response between the vaccines influence the duration of protection they provided.

Keywords: 50 μg) adsorbed on aluminum salt (500 μg Al(OH)3); ANOVA, analysis of variance; AS04, Adjuvant System containing 3-O-desacyl-4’-monophosphoryl lipid A (MPL; ATP, according-to-protocol; CI, confidence interval; CMI, cell-mediated immune; CVS, cervicovaginal secretion; Cervarix®; ED50, effective dose producing 50% response; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; GM, geometric mean; GMR, geometric mean (titer) ratio; GMT, geometric mean titer; Gardasil®; HPA, Health Protection Agency; HPV, human papillomavirus; IgG, immunoglobulin G; MSC, medically significant condition; NOAD, new onset autoimmune disease; NOCD, new onset chronic disease; PBMC, peripheral blood mononuclear cells; PBNA, pseudovirion-based neutralization assay; SAE, serious adverse event; TVC, total vaccinated cohort; VLP, virus-like particle; human papillomavirus; immunogenicity; nAb(s), neutralizing antibody(ies); safety.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Subject disposition ATP, according-to-protocol. The ATP cohort for immunogenicity included all evaluable subjects who received 3 vaccine doses (i.e., those meeting all eligibility criteria and complying with the procedures defined in the protocol) for whom data concerning immunogenicity endpoint measures were available. This included subjects for whom assay results were available for antibodies against at least one study vaccine antigen (HPV-16 or HPV-18) at the time point under analysis.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
GMTs for serum anti-HPV-16 and anti-HPV-18 type-specific neutralizing antibodies at Months 6, 7, 12, 18, 24, 36 and 48 (PBNA, ATP kinetic cohort; seronegative and DNA-negative for the HPV type analyzed prior to vaccination) Black lines, Human Papillomavirus Types 16 and 18 Vaccine (Recombinant, AS04-adjuvanted, adsorbed) (Cervarix®); gray lines, Human Papillomavirus Types 6, 11, 16 and 18 Vaccine, Recombinant (Gardasil®). Error bars denote 95% confidence intervals of geometric mean titers (GMTs). Dashed line, neutralizing antibody GMTs measured by pseudovirion-based neutralization assay (PBNA) in women in the total vaccinated cohort of the HPV-010 study who had cleared natural infection prior to vaccination (i.e., those who were seropositive and DNA-negative at Month 0): 180.1 ED50 for HPV-16 and 137.3 ED50 for HPV-18. Solid line, PBNA limit of detection (40 ED50). ED50, effective dose producing 50% response. The according-to-protocol (ATP) kinetic cohort is a sub-cohort of the ATP cohort for immunogenicity (seronegative and DNA-negative at baseline) that included all subjects without any elimination codes and with valid results available for the HPV type(s) and the assay considered in the analysis for each time point.

References

    1. Walboomers JM, Jacobs MV, Manos MM, Bosch FX, Kummer JA, Shah KV, Snijders PJ, Peto J, Meijer CJ, Munoz N. Human papillomavirus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer worldwide. J Pathol 1999; 189:12-9; PMID:10451482; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199909)189:1%3c12::AID-PATH431... - DOI - PubMed
    1. Winer RL, Lee S-K, Hughes JP, Adam DE, Kiviat NB, Koutsky LA. Genital human papillomavirus infection: incidence and risk factors in a cohort of female university students. Am J Epidemiol 2003; 157:218-26; PMID:12543621; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199909)189:1%3c12::AID-PATH431... - DOI - PubMed
    1. Partridge JM, Hughes JP, Feng Q, Winer RL, Weaver BA, Xi L-F, Stern ME, Lee S-K, O'Reilly SF, Hawes SE, et al. . Genital human papillomavirus infection in men: incidence and risk factors in a cohort of university students. J Infect Dis 2007; 196:1125-36; PMID:17955429; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199909)189:1%3c12::AID-PATH431... - DOI - PubMed
    1. Castellsague X, Schneider A, Kaufmann AM, Bosch FX. HPV vaccination against cervical cancer in women above 25 years of age: key considerations and current perspectives. Gynecol Oncol 2009; 115:S15-23; PMID:19819540; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199909)189:1%3c12::AID-PATH431... - DOI - PubMed
    1. WHO/ICO Information Centre on HPV and Cervical Cancer. HPV and cervical cancer in the 2007 report. Vaccine 2007; 25 Suppl 3:C1-26; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199909)189:1%3c12::AID-PATH431... - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

Associated data