Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Summer;20(3):181-90.
doi: 10.1310/sci2003-181.

Review of cross-cultural issues related to quality of life after spinal cord injury

Denise Tate  1 , Martin Forchheimer  1
Affiliations

Review of cross-cultural issues related to quality of life after spinal cord injury

Denise Tate et al. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2014 Summer.

Abstract

Quality of life (QOL) is a dynamic concept that means different things to different people, both in the general public and within the research community. Because of this, a common definition of QOL has been hard to achieve. This article reviews cross-cultural issues related to QOL research in spinal cord injury (SCI). Many factors influence QOL for persons with SCI, including observable and objective indicators and subjective self-report ones. The World Health Organization's International Classification of Function, Disability and Health is used in this article as a framework to better understand how these factors may influence QOL. A number of important steps are summarized with respect to measurement issues in QOL. A comparison between data from 2 countries (United States and Brazil) using the International SCI QOL Basic Data Set shows similarities in scores and good reliability in the Brazilian sample. Substantial, significant correlations were observed among the SCI QOL Basic Data Set items and the WHOQOL-BREF within the US sample. The article ends with a set of recommendations for the development of cross-cultural measures of QOL for use in the SCI population.

Keywords: cross-cultural; data sets; internationality; measurement; quality of life; spinal cord injury.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research. National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research; Notice of Proposed Long-Range Plan for Fiscal Years 1999–2004. In: Federal Register. Vol 63 Washington DC: United States Government Printing Office; 1998:57190–57219.
    1. Committee on Disability in America. Definition and monitoring of disability. In: Field MJ, Jette AM, eds. The Future of Disability in America. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2007:35–64. - PubMed
    1. WHOQOL Group. Study protocol for the World Health Organization project to develop a Quality of Life assessment instrument (WHOQOL). Qual Life Res. 1993;2(2):153–159. - PubMed
    1. WHOQOL Group. The World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment WHOQOL: Development and general psychometric properties. Soc Sci Med. 1998;46(12):1569–1585. - PubMed
    1. Diener E, Suh E, Smith H, Shao L. National differences in reported subjective well-being: Why do they occur? Soc Indicators Res. 1995;34(1):7–32.

LinkOut - more resources