Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007;1(3):207-11.
doi: 10.1007/s11701-007-0039-5. Epub 2007 Sep 15.

Pure robotic extended pyelolithotomy: cosmetic replica of open surgery

Affiliations

Pure robotic extended pyelolithotomy: cosmetic replica of open surgery

Rishi Nayyar et al. J Robot Surg. 2007.

Abstract

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has replaced open pyelolithotomy as the procedure of choice for treating large-burden renal stone disease, especially staghorn calculi. Although it is a minimally invasive procedure, it involves transgressing the renal parenchyma and is thus associated with its unique set of complications. The evolution of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy and robotic assistance has provided an opportunity to the surgeon to revisit pyelolithotomy in a minimally invasive manner following the age-old principles of the era of open renal surgery. We report the feasibility and our experience with this technique in three cases of partial staghorn calculus with intra-renal pelvis.

Keywords: Laparoscopy; Pyelolithotomy; Robotic; Staghorn calculus; Urolithiasis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Port position for right robotic pyelolithotomy after creation of the pneumoperitoneum
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Dissection of intra-renal pelvis. Renal pelvis (below) and renal parenchyma (above) are seen separated by the renal sinus fat (arrow)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Infundibulotomy for inferior calyceal secondary calculus in right kidney
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Antegrade DJ stent placement (see text)
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Home-made plastic bag for retrieval of stones

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hemal AK, Goel A, Kumar M, Gupta NP. Evaluation of laparoscopic retroperitoneal surgery in urinary stone disease. J Enodourol. 2001;15:701–705. doi: 10.1089/08927790152596271. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Goel A, Hemal AK. Evaluation of role of retroperitoneoscopic pyelolithotomy and its comparison with percutaneous nephrolithotripsy. Int Urol Nephrol. 2003;35(1):73–76. doi: 10.1023/A:1025962009286. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Phillips CK, Taneja SS, Stifelman MD. Robot assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: the NYU technique. J Endourol. 2005;19:441–445. doi: 10.1089/end.2005.19.441. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Badani KK, Hemal AK, Fumo M, et al. Robotic extended pyelolithotomy for treatment of renal calculi: a feasibility study. World J Urol. 2006;24:198–201. doi: 10.1007/s00345-006-0099-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gettman MT, Neurerer R, Bartsch G, Peschel R. Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty performed with the Da Vinci robotic system. Urology. 2002;60:509–513. doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(02)01761-2. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources