Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008;1(4):291-5.
doi: 10.1007/s11701-007-0058-2. Epub 2008 Jan 4.

Laparoscopic robotic-assisted gastrointestinal surgery: the Geneva experience

Affiliations

Laparoscopic robotic-assisted gastrointestinal surgery: the Geneva experience

Claudio Soravia et al. J Robot Surg. 2008.

Erratum in

Abstract

The continuing development of robotic surgery supports its use in laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery. Our study retrospectively reviewed the surgical outcome and patient's satisfaction of gastrointestinal laparoscopic robotic procedures. From January 2003 to September 2007, 94 patients (27 women, 67 men) with a mean age of 53 years (range 19-84 years) underwent laparoscopic surgery with a da Vinci robotic system. There were 40 colorectal cases (43%), 31 anti-reflux surgery cases (33%) and 14 obesity surgery cases (15%); the remaining cases consisted of gastric and gallbladder surgery, intra-abdominal tumour excisions, and hepatic cyst resections. The majority of the cases (88, 94%) were performed for benign disease. The mean operative time was 153 min (range 60-330 min). One patient needed a blood transfusion. The mean body mass index was 25 (range 16-47). No death occurred. Five cases (5.3%) were converted to conventional laparoscopic surgery (n = 3) or to laparotomy (n = 2). Morbidity consisted of one Nissen redo surgery to loosen a tight anti-reflux valve 6 days after robotic surgery, a robotic left ureter repair and pelvic haemorrhage following proctectomy requiring re-operation to control haemostasis and to remove pelvic haematoma. Mean follow-up time was 11 months (range 15 days to 34 months). One case of incisional trocar hernia needed re-operation. Overall patient's satisfaction was high: few scars were cheloïd, while functional surgical outcome was rated high by most of the patients. Our preliminary experience was encouraging, with minimal morbidity and very high acceptance by patients.

Keywords: Colon; Colorectal cancer; Diverticular diseases; Gastric banding; Gastro-esophageal reflux diseases; Nissen fundoplication; Obesity surgery; Rectum; Robotic surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Mouret P. How I developed laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Acad Med. 1996;25(5):744–747. - PubMed
    1. Himpens J, Leman G, Cadière GB. Telesurgical laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 1998;12(8):1091. doi: 10.1007/s004649900788. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cadière GB, Himpens J, Germay O. Feasibility of robotic laparoscopic surgery: 146 cases. World J Surg. 2001;25(11):1467–1477. - PubMed
    1. Chitwood WR, Nifong LW, Chapman WHH. Robotic surgical training in an academic institution. Ann Surg. 2001;234(4):475–486. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200110000-00007. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Perez A, Zinner MJ, Ashley SW, Brooks DC, Whang EE. What is the value of robotic technology in gastrointestinal surgery? Surg Endosc. 2003;17(5):811–813. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-8561-z. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources