Should Aid Reward Performance?: Evidence from a Field Experiment on Health and Education in Indonesia
- PMID: 25485039
- PMCID: PMC4254820
- DOI: 10.1257/app.6.4.1
Should Aid Reward Performance?: Evidence from a Field Experiment on Health and Education in Indonesia
Abstract
We report an experiment in 3,000 villages that tested whether incentives improve aid efficacy. Villages received block grants for maternal and child health and education that incorporated relative performance incentives. Subdistricts were randomized into incentives, an otherwise identical program without incentives, or control. Incentives initially improved preventative health indicators, particularly in underdeveloped areas, and spending efficiency increased. While school enrollments improved overall, incentives had no differential impact on education, and incentive health effects diminished over time. Reductions in neonatal mortality in non-incentivized areas did not persist with incentives. We find no systematic scoring manipulation nor funding reallocation toward richer areas.
References
-
- Almond Douglas, Mazumder Bhashkar. Health Capital and the Prenatal Environment: the Effect of Ramadan Observance During Pregnancy. American Economic Journal-Applied Economics. 2011;3(4):56–85.
-
- Baicker Katherine, Clemens Jeffrey, Singhal Monica. The Rise of the States: US Fiscal Decentralization in the Postwar Period. Journal of Public Economics. 2012;96(11):1079–1091.
-
- Baird Sarah, McIntosh Craig, Ozler Berk. Cash or Condition? Evidence from a Cash Transfer Experiment. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2011;126(4):1709–1753.
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources