Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Feb;59(2):1145-51.
doi: 10.1128/AAC.04606-14. Epub 2014 Dec 8.

Added benefit of raxibacumab to antibiotic treatment of inhalational anthrax

Affiliations

Added benefit of raxibacumab to antibiotic treatment of inhalational anthrax

Thi-Sau Migone et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015 Feb.

Abstract

Although antibiotics treat bacteremia in inhalational anthrax, pathogenesis is mainly driven by bacterial exotoxins. Raxibacumab, an IgG1 monoclonal antibody, binds the protective antigen (PA) of Bacillus anthracis, thus blocking toxin effects and leading to improved survival in the rabbit and monkey models of inhalational anthrax. To assess raxibacumab's added benefit over levofloxacin (LVX) alone, rabbits surviving to 84 h after a challenge with 200 times the median (50%) lethal dose of B. anthracis spores were randomized to receive 3 daily intragastric LVX doses of 50 mg/kg of body weight, with the first LVX dose administered just prior to administration of a single intravenous dose of placebo or 40 mg/kg raxibacumab. The percentages of animals alive at 28 days following the last LVX dose were compared between the 2 treatment groups using a two-sided likelihood-ratio chi-square test. The 82% survival rate for the LVX-raxibacumab combination was higher than the 65% survival rate for LVX alone (P=0.0874). There were nearly 2-fold fewer deaths for the combination (7 deaths; n=39) than for LVX alone (13 deaths; n=37), and the survival time was prolonged for the combination (P=0.1016). Toxin-neutralizing-activity titers were similar for both treatment groups, suggesting that survivors in both groups were able to mount a toxin-neutralizing immune response. Microscopic findings considered consistent with anthrax were present in animals that died or became moribund on study in both treatment groups, and there were no anthrax-related findings in animals that survived. Overall, raxibacumab provided a meaningful benefit over antibiotic alone when administered late in the disease course.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
Survival outcomes in New Zealand White rabbits after challenge with B. anthracis spores at ∼200 times the LD50 and treatment with LVX (50 mg/kg daily for 3 days) plus a single i.v. dose of placebo or 40 mg/kg raxibacumab administered at 84 h postchallenge. (A) Primary endpoint analysis. The P value is based on a two-sided likelihood-ratio chi-square test. (B) Absolute improvement in day 28 survival by subgroup and 95% CI for the raxibacumab-LVX combination group compared with the LVX-alone group. X, point estimate; solid vertical line, 0% benefit; dashed vertical line, point estimate of the survival benefit in the overall (ITT) population. The 95% CIs were calculated by normal approximation. levo, levofloxacin; raxi, raxibacumab. (C) Survival time from the time of spore challenge. The P value was obtained from a log-rank test comparing the survival times between the raxibacumab-LVX combination group and the LVX-alone group.
FIG 2
FIG 2
Plasma raxibacumab concentration-time profiles in rabbits administered 3 daily intragastric 50-mg/kg LVX doses in combination with a single i.v. 40-mg/kg raxibacumab dose. (Top) Linear scale; (bottom) semilogarithmic scale.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Holty JE, Bravata DM, Liu H, Olshen RA, McDonald KM, Owens DK. 2006. Systematic review: a century of inhalational anthrax cases from 1900 to 2005. Ann Intern Med 144:270–280. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-144-4-200602210-00009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Inglesby TV, O'Toole T, Henderson DA, Bartlett JG, Ascher MS, Eitzen E, Friedlander AM, Gerberding J, Hauer J, Hughes J, McDade J, Osterholmn MT, Parker G, Perl TM, Russell PK, Tonat K. 2002. Anthrax as a biological weapon, 2002: updated recommendations for management. JAMA 287:2236–2252. doi:10.1001/jama.287.17.2236. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jernigan DB, Raghunathan PL, Bell BP, Brechner R, Bresnitz EA, Butler JC, Cetron M, Cohen M, Doyle T, Fischer M, Greene C, Griffith KS, Guarner J, Hadler JL, Hayslett JA, Meyer R, Petersen LR, Phillips M, Pinner R, Popovic T, Quinn CP, Reefhuis J, Reissman D, Rosenstein N, Schuchat A, Shieh W-J, Siegal L, Swerdlow DL, Tenover FC, Traeger M, Ward JW, Weisfuse I, Wiersma S, Yewskey K, Zaki S, Ashford DA, Perkins BA, Ostroff S, Hughes J, Fleming D, Koplan JP, Gerberding JL, , National Anthrax Epidemiologic Investigation Team . 2002. Investigation of bioterrorism-related anthrax, United States, 2001: epidemiologic findings. Emerg Infect Dis 8:1019–1028. doi:10.3201/eid0810.020353. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jernigan JA, Stephens DS, Ashford DA, Omenaca C, Topiel MS, Galbraith M, Tapper M, Fisk TL, Zaki S, Popovic T, Meyer RF, Quinn CP, Harper SA, Fridkin SK, Sejvar JJ, Shepard CW, McConnell M, Guarner J, Shieh W-J, Malecki JM, Gerberding JL, Hughes JM, Perkins BA, Members of the Anthrax Bioterrorism Investigation Team . 2001. Bioterrorism-related inhalational anthrax: the first 10 cases reported in the United States. Emerg Infect Dis 7:933–944. doi:10.3201/eid0706.010604. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dixon TC, Meselson M, Guillemin J, Hanna PC. 1999. Anthrax. N Engl J Med 341:815–826. doi:10.1056/NEJM199909093411107. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Supplementary concepts