The reporting quality of meta-analysis results of systematic review abstracts in periodontology and implant dentistry is suboptimal
- PMID: 25488877
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2014.10.003
The reporting quality of meta-analysis results of systematic review abstracts in periodontology and implant dentistry is suboptimal
Abstract
Article title and bibliographic information: Assessment of the quality of reporting in abstracts of systematic reviews with meta-analyses in periodontology and implant dentistry. Faggion CM Jr., Liu J, Huda F, Atieh M. J Periodontal Res 2014; 49(2):137-42.
Reviewer: Argy Polychronopoulou, DDS, MS, ScM, ScD PURPOSE/QUESTION: What is the reporting quality of meta-analysis results of abstracts of systematic reviews in periodontology and implant dentistry journals?
Source of funding: The authors received no funding for this study
Type of study/design: Meta-epidemiological study
Level of evidence: Level 3: Other evidence
Strength of recommendation grade: Not applicable.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment on
-
Assessment of the quality of reporting in abstracts of systematic reviews with meta-analyses in periodontology and implant dentistry.J Periodontal Res. 2014 Apr;49(2):137-42. doi: 10.1111/jre.12092. Epub 2013 May 14. J Periodontal Res. 2014. PMID: 23668725 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials
