Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014;10(4):301-7.
doi: 10.5114/pwki.2014.46775. Epub 2014 Nov 17.

Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia ablation with radiofrequency energy during ongoing tachycardia: is it feasible?

Basri Amasyali  1 , Ayhan Kilic  2 , Kutsi Kabul  2 , Murat Unlu  2
Affiliations

Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia ablation with radiofrequency energy during ongoing tachycardia: is it feasible?

Basri Amasyali et al. Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2014.

Abstract

Introduction: Radiofrequency (RF) ablation of the slow pathway for treatment of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is conventionally performed during sinus rhythm.

Aim: To evaluate the clinical and electrophysiological features and the short- and long-term results of slow pathway RF ablation during ongoing AVNRT.

Material and methods: A total of 282 consecutive patients with AVNRT undergoing RF catheter ablation were analysed. Patients whose tachycardia episodes could not be controlled during RF energy application and who underwent slow pathway ablation or modification during ongoing tachycardia formed the study group (group 1, n = 16) and those ablated during sinus rhythm formed the control group (group 2, n = 266).

Results: Of the clinical characteristics, only the frequency of tachycardia attacks was higher in group 1 (3.3 ±1.2 vs. 2.1 ±0.9 attacks/month, p < 0.001). Among the baseline electrophysiological measurements, the echo zone lasted significantly longer in group 1 than in group 2 (78 ±25 ms vs. 47 ±18 ms; p < 0.001). The immediate procedural success rate was 100% in both groups. There were no significant differences between groups regarding the mean number of radiofrequency energy applications (5.2 ±4.2 vs. 5.8 ±3.9), total procedure times (42.4 ±30.5 min vs. 40.2 ±29.4 min) and fluoroscopy times (11.4 ±8.5 min vs. 12.2 ±9.3 min) (p > 0.050 for all). All patients were followed-up for 29 ±7 months; only 2 patients (< 1%) in group 2 recurred (p > 0.050). No permanent atrioventricular block was observed.

Conclusions: The RF catheter ablation or modification of the slow pathway during ongoing AVNRT is feasible with acceptable short- and long-term efficacy and safety. However, this approach needs to be clarified with large-scale studies.

Keywords: atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia; catheter ablation; slow pathway ablation; supraventricular tachycardia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Elvas L, Gursoy S, Brugada J, et al. Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: a review. Can J Cardiol. 1994;10:342–8. - PubMed
    1. Furushima H, Chinushi M, Sugiura H, et al. Radiofrequency catheter ablation for incessant atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia normalized H-V block associated with tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy. J Electrocardiol. 2004;37:315–9. - PubMed
    1. Selvaraj R, Arunprasath P, Karthikeyan B, et al. Uncommon presentation of a common tachycardia. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2010;10:426–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Selvaraj R, Ananthakrishnapillai A, Sadasivam R, et al. “Pseudo PJRT”-fast-slow AV nodal reentrant tachycardia presenting with tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2013;36:e4–6. - PubMed
    1. Otomo K, Suyama K, Okamura H, et al. Implications of 2:1 atrioventricular block during typical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2007;19:109–19. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources