Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Dec 9;12(12):e1002017.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002017. eCollection 2014 Dec.

Not just a theory--the utility of mathematical models in evolutionary biology

Affiliations

Not just a theory--the utility of mathematical models in evolutionary biology

Maria R Servedio et al. PLoS Biol. .

Abstract

Progress in science often begins with verbal hypotheses meant to explain why certain biological phenomena exist. An important purpose of mathematical models in evolutionary research, as in many other fields, is to act as “proof-of-concept” tests of the logic in verbal explanations, paralleling the way in which empirical data are used to test hypotheses. Because not all subfields of biology use mathematics for this purpose, misunderstandings of the function of proof-of-concept modeling are common. In the hope of facilitating communication, we discuss the role of proof-of-concept modeling in evolutionary biology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Parallels between empirical experimental techniques and proof-of-concept modeling in the scientific process.
This flowchart shows the steps in the scientific process, emphasizing the relationship between experimental empirical techniques and proof-of-concept modeling. Other approaches, including ones that combine empirical and mathematical techniques, are not shown. We note that some questions are best addressed by one or the other of these techniques, while others might benefit from both approaches. Proof-of-concept models, for example, are best suited to testing the logical correctness of verbal hypotheses (i.e., whether certain assumptions actually lead to certain predictions), while only empirical approaches can address hypotheses about which assumptions are most commonly met in nature. (A) A general description of the scientific process. (B) Steps in the scientific process as approached by experimental empirical techniques. In this case, statistical techniques are often used to analyze the gathered data. (C) Steps in the scientific process as approached by proof-of-concept modeling. Here, techniques such as invasion and stability analyses, stochastic simulations, and numerical analyses are employed to analyze the expected outcomes of a model. In both cases, the hypothesis can be evaluated by comparing the results of the analyses to the original predictions.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Milinski M (2014) The past and future of Behavioral Ecology. Behav Ecol 25: 680–684.
    1. Barton NH, Turelli M (1991) Natural and sexual selection on many loci. Genetics 127: 229–255. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nagylaki T (1993) The evolution of multilocus systems under weak selection. Genetics 134: 627–647. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Coulson T, Tuljapurkar S, Childs DZ (2010) Using evolutionary demography to link life history theory, quantitative genetics and population ecology. J Anim Ecol 79: 1226–1240. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bürger R, Lynch M (1995) Evolution and extinction in a changing environment: a quantitative-genetic analysis. Evolution 49: 151–163. - PubMed

Publication types