Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jan 27;9(1):180-90.
doi: 10.1021/nn502992x. Epub 2014 Dec 17.

Ion-specific control of the self-assembly dynamics of a nanostructured protein lattice

Affiliations

Ion-specific control of the self-assembly dynamics of a nanostructured protein lattice

Behzad Rad et al. ACS Nano. .

Abstract

Self-assembling proteins offer a potential means of creating nanostructures with complex structure and function. However, using self-assembly to create nanostructures with long-range order whose size is tunable is challenging, because the kinetics and thermodynamics of protein interactions depend sensitively on solution conditions. Here we systematically investigate the impact of varying solution conditions on the self-assembly of SbpA, a surface-layer protein from Lysinibacillus sphaericus that forms two-dimensional nanosheets. Using high-throughput light scattering measurements, we mapped out diagrams that reveal the relative yield of self-assembly of nanosheets over a wide range of concentrations of SbpA and Ca(2+). These diagrams revealed a localized region of optimum yield of nanosheets at intermediate Ca(2+) concentration. Replacement of Mg(2+) or Ba(2+) for Ca(2+) indicates that Ca(2+) acts both as a specific ion that is required to induce self-assembly and as a general divalent cation. In addition, we use competitive titration experiments to find that 5 Ca(2+) bind to SbpA with an affinity of 67.1 ± 0.3 μM. Finally, we show via modeling that nanosheet assembly occurs by growth from a negligibly small critical nucleus. We also chart the dynamics of nanosheet size over a variety of conditions. Our results demonstrate control of the dynamics and size of the self-assembly of a nanostructured lattice, the constituents of which are one of a class of building blocks able to form novel hybrid nanomaterials.

Keywords: Ca2+ binding; biomaterials; nanostructures; protein interactions; self-assembly dynamics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Light scattering is a measure of SbpA nanosheet growth in solution. (A) Representative traces of A340nmvs time from light-scattering assays containing SbpA (6.8 μM) in solution in the absence (dashed line) or presence of 10 mM Ca2+ (solid line), indicating that increases in light scattering are associated with nanosheet formation. The colored, solid circles represent time points at which samples were imaged by STEM. (B) STEM images of negatively stained nanosheets of SbpA (6.8 μM) formed in the presence of 10 mM Ca2+after 800 min. The white arrows point to stacks of square protein sheets. The scale bar represents 1 μm. (C) Histogram of the side lengths of sheets visualized by STEM at increasing reaction times. For each measurement, the total number of nanosheets measured (N) is indicated. The dashed curves represent Gaussian fits to each data set. (D) The side lengths of nanosheets as a function of time, indicating the growth of sheets with time. The average and standard deviation of the side length are determined from the Gaussian fits shown in C. The solid line is a fit of eq 6 to the data.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Scattering by growing nanosheets is sufficient to describe the sigmoidal behavior in light scattering. Plot of the attenuation coefficient measuring self-assembly of SbpA into nanosheets at a concentration of 6.8 μM with a Ca2+ concentration of 10 mM is shown. The calculated scattering values from the mean size and error of nanosheets of SbpA from Figure 1D are overlaid as closed circles with the standard error of the mean shown in black and the standard deviation shown in gray.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The dynamics and yield of nanosheets of SbpA are dependent on both the protein and Ca2+ concentration. (A) Normalized A340nm (Anorm) as a function of Ca2+ and SbpA concentration at 100 (left panel), 400 (middle panel), and 780 min (right panel) after starting the reaction. At 780 min, the data show a localized region of nanosheet assembly. The color scale indicates the value of Anorm (calculated as detailed in Methods) and is identical for each panel. (B) Representative STEM images of SbpA reactions at three different Ca2+ concentrations: 0.25 mM (circle), 5 mM (square), and 150 mM (triangle). The scale bar represents 2 μm for the left and middle panel and 4 μm for the right panel.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Formation of SbpA nanosheets in solution requires a minimum amount of free protein monomer. The end point Anorm plotted as a function of the SbpA concentration at 50 mM Ca2+ (black circles). The error bars represent the standard deviation of at least 3 measurements. The critical concentration of SbpA was determined by fitting a line through the data, and determining the intercept with the x-axis.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Formation of SbpA nanosheets in solution is not linearly dependent on the divalent ion concentration. (A) End point absorbance measurement from light scattering assays as a function of the divalent cation concentration for Ca2+ only (blue circles), 5 mM Ca2+ + Mg2+ (black circles), or 5 mM Ca2+ + Ba2+ (red circles). (B) End point absorbance measurements from light scattering experiments in which the total divalent ion concentration was kept at 50 mM total, while varying the relative concentrations of Ca2+ and Mg2+. A linear fit of the data gives a slope of −10–3 (black line). The x-axis is linearly scaled before the break, and is on a logarithmic scale after the axis break. Error bars represent standard deviation from 2 to 3 measurements.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Tb3+ luminescence can measure binding of SbpA to Ca2+. (A) A solution of SbpA (6.8 μM) with 10 mM Tb3+ was excited at 280 nm and the emission of the sample was observed from 450 to 700 nm. Four peaks are observed at 490, 546, 585, and 620 nm, indicating that Tb3+ binds to SbpA. (B) Titration binding curve of Tb3+ to 1.51 μM SbpA as measured by Tb3+ luminescence. The complex was excited at 280 nm and the emission observed at 544 nm. The solid circles represent data points and the solid line is a fit of a one-site binding curve to the data. The dashed lines are fits to linear portions of the data. The intersection of the dashed lines was used to determine the stoichiometric break-point for this binding curve. (C) Competition of Tb3+-SbpA complexes with Ca2+ as measured by a decrease in the Tb3+ luminescence. The open circles are titration data, which are fit by a competition binding curve shown by a solid line. The error bars represent the standard deviation determined from two experiments.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Self-assembly by SbpA corresponds to irreversible growth. (A) Estimated sheet lengths from the end point light scattering data are plotted as a function of the [Ca2+] and [SbpA] at 780 min (Figure 2A). The lengths were calculated using the equation for scattering by dielectric discs and using a sheet thickness of 10 nm. The color map is capped at 3000 nm due to the variability of the lengths calculated with high light scattering. (B) Anorm as a function of time for SbpA self-assembly at 50 mM Ca2+ and increasing protein concentration (colored curves). Fits to eq 4 are shown as dashed curves in the same color.

References

    1. Pavkov-Keller T.; Howorka S.; Keller W. The Structure of Bacterial S-Layer Proteins. Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci. 2011, 103, 73–130. - PubMed
    1. Pum D.; Toca-Herrera J. L.; Sleytr U. B. S-Layer Protein Self-Assembly. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 2484–2501. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brodin J. D.; Ambroggio X. I.; Tang C.; Parent K. N.; Baker T. S.; Tezcan F. A. Metal-Directed, Chemically Tunable Assembly of One-, Two- and Three-Dimensional Crystalline Protein Arrays. Nat. Chem. 2012, 4, 375–382. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vekilov P. G. The Two-Step Mechanism of Nucleation of Crystals in Solution. Nanoscale 2010, 2, 2346–2357. - PubMed
    1. Whitelam S. Control of Pathways and Yields of Protein Crystallization through the Interplay of Nonspecific and Specific Attractions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010, 105, 088102. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms