Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Dec 11:11:E218.
doi: 10.5888/pcd11.140326.

The role of fear and disgust in predicting the effectiveness of television advertisements that graphically depict the health harms of smoking

Harpa Lind Jónsdóttir  1 , Jeffrey E Holm  1 , Dmitri Poltavski  1 , Nancy Vogeltanz-Holm  2
Affiliations

The role of fear and disgust in predicting the effectiveness of television advertisements that graphically depict the health harms of smoking

Harpa Lind Jónsdóttir et al. Prev Chronic Dis. .

Abstract

Introduction: Antismoking television advertisements that depict the graphic health harms of smoking are increasingly considered best practices, as exemplified by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's current national campaign. Evaluation of responses to these widely used advertisements is important to determine advertisements that are most effective and their mechanisms of action. Our study tested the hypothesis that advertisements rated highest in fear- and disgust-eliciting imagery would be rated as the most effective.

Methods: Our laboratory study included 144 women and men aged 18 to 33; 84% were current nonsmokers. All participants viewed 6 antismoking television advertisements that depicted the health harms of smoking; they rated their responses of fear and disgust and the effectiveness of the advertisements. We used multilevel modeling to test the effects of the following in predicting effectiveness: fear, disgust, the fear-disgust interaction, the advertisement, and the participant's sex and smoking status. Follow-up analyses examined differences in ratings of fear, disgust, and effectiveness.

Results: Advertisement, fear, disgust, and the fear-disgust interaction were each significant predictors of effectiveness. Smoking status and sex were not significant predictors. The 3 advertisements that elicited the highest ratings of fear and disgust were rated the most effective.

Conclusion: Our findings support the hypothesis that antismoking advertisements of health harms that elicit the greatest responses of fear or disgust are the most effective. When advertisements elicit high ratings of both fear and disgust, advertisements with graphic imagery are effective, whereas advertisements without graphic imagery are not.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wakefield M, Chaloupka F. Effectiveness of comprehensive tobacco control programmes in reducing teenage smoking in the USA. Tob Control 2000;9(2):177–86. 10.1136/tc.9.2.177 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. McVey D, Stapleton J. Can antismoking television advertising affect smoking behavior? Controlled trial of the Health Education Authority for England’s antismoking TV campaign. Tob Control 2000;9(3):273–82. 10.1136/tc.9.3.273 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Emery S, Wakefield MA, Terry-McElrath YM, Saffer H, Szczypka G, O’Malley P, et al. Televised state-sponsored anti-tobacco advertising and youth smoking beliefs and behavior in the United States, 1999–2000. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2005;159(7):639–45. 10.1001/archpedi.159.7.639 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Biener L, Reimer RL, Wakefield M, Szczypka G, Rigotti NA, Connolly G. Impact of smoking cessation aids and mass media among recent quitters. Am J Prev Med 2006;30(3):217–24. 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.10.026 - DOI - PubMed
    1. National Cancer Institute. The role of the media in promoting and reducing tobacco use: tobacco control monograph no. 19. Bethesda (MD): US Department of Health and Human Services; 2008.

Publication types

MeSH terms