Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Sep;68(9):1068-75.
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.001. Epub 2014 Nov 13.

Covariate adjustment had similar benefits in small and large randomized controlled trials

Douglas D Thompson  1 , Hester F Lingsma  2 , William N Whiteley  3 , Gordon D Murray  4 , Ewout W Steyerberg  2
Affiliations

Covariate adjustment had similar benefits in small and large randomized controlled trials

Douglas D Thompson et al. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Sep.

Abstract

Objectives: Covariate adjustment is a standard statistical approach in the analysis of randomized controlled trials. We aimed to explore whether the benefit of covariate adjustment on statistical significance and power differed between small and large trials, where chance imbalance in prognostic factors necessarily differs.

Study design and setting: We studied two large trial data sets [Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO-I), N = 30,510 and International Stroke Trial (IST), N = 18,372] repeatedly drawing random samples (500,000 times) of sizes 300 and 5,000 per arm and simulated each primary outcome using the control arms. We empirically determined the treatment effects required to fix power at 80% for all unadjusted analyses and calculated the joint probabilities in the discordant cells when cross-classifying adjusted and unadjusted results from logistic regression models (ie, P < 0.05 vs. P ≥ 0.05).

Results: The power gained from an adjusted analysis for small and large samples was between 5% and 6%. Similar proportions of discordance were noted irrespective of the sample size in both the GUSTO-I and the IST data sets.

Conclusion: The proportions of change in statistical significance from covariate adjustment of strongly prognostic characteristics were the same for small and large trials with similar gains in statistical power. Covariate adjustment is equally recommendable in small and large trials.

Keywords: Chance imbalance; Covariate adjustment; Logistic regression analysis; Randomized trial; Sample size; Simulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Senn SJ. Statistical issues in drug development. 2. Wiley; 2007.
    1. Steyerberg EW, Bossuyt PMM, Lee KL. Clinical trials in acute myocardial infarction: Should we adjust for baseline characteristics? American Heart Journal. 2000;139(5):745–51. - PubMed
    1. Turner EL, Perel P, Clayton T, Edwards P, Hernández AV, Roberts I, et al. Covariate adjustment increased power in randomized controlled trials: an example in traumatic brain injury. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2012;65(5):474–81. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kahan B, Jairath V, Dore C, Morris T. The risks and rewards of covariate adjustment in randomized trials: an assessment of 12 outcomes from 8 studies. Trials. 2014;15(1):139. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hernández AV, Steyerberg EW, Habbema JDF. Covariate adjustment in randomized controlled trials with dichotomous outcomes increases statistical power and reduces sample size requirements. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2004;57(5):454–60. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources