Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014;108(10):576-86.
doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2014.10.013. Epub 2014 Nov 20.

[Effectiveness of quality assurance programmes for inpatient care in Germany: a literature review]

[Article in German]
Affiliations

[Effectiveness of quality assurance programmes for inpatient care in Germany: a literature review]

[Article in German]
Carmen Khan et al. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2014.

Abstract

Background: Over the past decades, a large number of measures for quality management and quality assurance (QM/QA) of healthcare were established in the German healthcare system. Considering the resources required, it has been repeatedly demanded that such quality programmes be checked for their effectiveness. In this context, the present paper describes the results of a systematic literature review to evaluate German QM/QA programmes in the inpatient sector.

Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in the electronic databases Medline, Cochrane Library and topic-related institution websites. In addition, hand searches were conducted, and the search engine Google Scholar was used. For Germany, no time limit was placed on the literature search. Evaluation studies were only selected if they included a comparison group without or at the beginning of a QM/QA programme and measured the effects on outcomes, process or structure of inpatient care. The methodological quality of the eligible studies was assessed and summarised.

Results: Out of 3,065 hits, 18 publications were included in the literature review. In Germany, no causal relationships between QM/QA programmes and a relevant benefit for improved quality of care for patients in the hospital sector could be detected in any study. Results were inconsistent or insufficiently reliable without demonstrating a clear positive or negative impact of the analysed programmes on the quality of care. Overall, the quality of the included studies was low.

Conclusion: No acceptable scientific studies for the German healthcare system could be detected that provided proof for a patient-related effectiveness or ineffectiveness of the established quality programmes. Due to the insufficient evidence and despite the challenges faced when conducting convincing evaluation studies in the field of QM/QA, established methods of the evaluation research should be applied and extended.

Keywords: Evaluation; Krankenhaus; Quality assurance programme; Qualitätsmanagementprogramm; Qualitätssicherungsprogramm; Qualitätsverbesserung; Wirksamkeit; effectiveness; efficacy; evaluation; hospital; quality improvement; quality management programme.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources