Essure hysteroscopic sterilization versus interval laparoscopic bilateral tubal ligation: a comparative effectiveness review
- PMID: 25499775
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.12.002
Essure hysteroscopic sterilization versus interval laparoscopic bilateral tubal ligation: a comparative effectiveness review
Abstract
A comparative effectiveness analysis was performed to examine the risks and benefits of laparoscopic bilateral tubal ligation compared with hysteroscopic sterilization using the Essure Permanent Birth Control System (Bayer HealthCare AG, Whippany, NJ). Existing evidence shows that both LBTL and Essure are safe and effective methods of female sterilization. Both have high rates of efficacy and low rates of complications although when complications do occur, those related to the Essure procedure are more likely to be minor in nature. The analysis was limited by the restricted number of studies involving head-to-head comparisons of the 2 approaches.
Keywords: Essure; Hysteroscopic sterilization; Laparoscopic; Tubal ligation.
Copyright © 2015 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Hysteroscopic tubal sterilization: an evidence-based analysis.Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2013 Oct 1;13(21):1-35. eCollection 2013. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2013. PMID: 24228084 Free PMC article. Review.
-
An economic comparison of female sterilization of hysteroscopic tubal occlusion with laparoscopic bilateral tubal ligation.Contraception. 2009 Sep;80(3):254-60. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2009.02.010. Epub 2009 Apr 22. Contraception. 2009. PMID: 19698817
-
ICSI pregnancy outcomes following hysteroscopic placement of Essure devices for hydrosalpinx in laparoscopic contraindicated patients.Reprod Biomed Online. 2014 Jul;29(1):113-8. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.03.005. Epub 2014 Mar 21. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014. PMID: 24813749
-
Tubal sterilization: pregnancy rates after hysteroscopic versus laparoscopic sterilization in France, 2006-2010.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Sep;180:133-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.04.043. Epub 2014 May 14. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014. PMID: 24993770
-
Current techniques and outcomes in hysteroscopic sterilization: current evidence, considerations, and complications with hysteroscopic sterilization micro inserts.Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Aug;29(4):218-224. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000369. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2017. PMID: 28537948 Review.
Cited by
-
Discussion on operative skills in the embolization of hydrosalpinx by hysteroscopic placement of a microcoil.Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Mar;98(11):e14721. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014721. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019. PMID: 30882637 Free PMC article.
-
Live birth rate and neonatal outcomes following interventional embolization of hydrosalpinx.Reprod Health. 2022 Dec 1;19(1):213. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01522-7. Reprod Health. 2022. PMID: 36457061 Free PMC article.
-
Comparing options for women seeking permanent contraception in high-resource countries: a protocol for a systematic review.Syst Rev. 2019 Mar 26;8(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-0987-7. Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 30914067 Free PMC article.
-
Safety and efficacy of hysteroscopic sterilization compared with laparoscopic sterilization: an observational cohort study.BMJ. 2015 Oct 13;351:h5162. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h5162. BMJ. 2015. PMID: 26462857 Free PMC article.
-
Techniques for the interruption of tubal patency for female sterilisation.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 5;2016(8):CD003034. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003034.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 27494193 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical