Fibrinogen reduction and bleeding complications in plasma exchange, immunoadsorption and a combination of the two
- PMID: 25501972
- DOI: 10.1159/000367682
Fibrinogen reduction and bleeding complications in plasma exchange, immunoadsorption and a combination of the two
Abstract
Background: Immunoadsorption (IAS) and therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) are considered safe although fibrinogen is removed. To date no comparison of fibrinogen reduction and associated risk of bleeding in apheresis exists.
Methods: Retrospective analysis of TPE, three IAS adsorbers, and combined TPE/IAS regarding fibrinogen reduction and bleeding incidence in 67 patients (1,032 treatments).
Results: TPE and TPE/IAS reduced fibrinogen by 64 ± 11% and 58 ± 9%, leading to concentrations <100 mg/dl in 20 and 17% of treatments, respectively. IAS decreased fibrinogen less than TPE (26 ± 6%, p < 0.0001), resulting in fibrinogen concentrations <100 mg/dl in 1% of treatments. The processed volume correlated with reduction in TPE (r = 0.64, p < 0.01), but not in IAS. Bleeding occurred in 1.3% (IAS), 2.3% (TPE) and 3.1% (TPE/IAS) of treatments.
Conclusion: Hypofibrinogenemia occurs in 20% of patients after TPE and TPE/IAS, but rarely after IAS. IAS removes fibrinogen independently of volume processed. Overall, bleeding is rare in apheresis.
© 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel.
Comment in
-
Immunoadsorption versus therapeutic plasma exchange. Will fibrinogen make the difference?Blood Purif. 2014;38(2):158-9. doi: 10.1159/000369378. Epub 2014 Dec 4. Blood Purif. 2014. PMID: 25501843 No abstract available.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
