Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Apr;8(1):33-41.
doi: 10.1007/s12307-014-0161-7. Epub 2014 Dec 11.

Biomodulatory Treatment of Patients with Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Phase II Study of Imatinib with Pioglitazone, Etoricoxib, Dexamethasone and Low-Dose Treosulfan

Affiliations

Biomodulatory Treatment of Patients with Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Phase II Study of Imatinib with Pioglitazone, Etoricoxib, Dexamethasone and Low-Dose Treosulfan

M Vogelhuber et al. Cancer Microenviron. 2015 Apr.

Erratum in

Abstract

Therapeutic options for patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) remain limited. In a multicenter, Phase II study, 65 patients with histologically confirmed CRPC received a biomodulatory regimen during the six-month core study. Treatment comprised daily doses of imatinib mesylate, pioglitazone, etoricoxib, treosulfan and dexamethasone. The primary endpoint was prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response. Responders could enter an extension phase until disease progression or intolerable toxicity occurred. Mean PSA was 45.3 ng/mL at baseline, and 77 % of patients had a PSA doubling time <3 months. Of the 61 evaluable patients, 37 patients (60.6 %) responded or had stable disease and 23 of them (37.7 % of 61 patients) were PSA responders. Among the 23 responders mean PSA decreased from 278.9 ± 784.1 ng/mL at baseline to 8.8 ± 11.6 ng/mL at the final visit (week 24). The progression-free survival (PFS) was 467 days in the ITT population. Of the 947 adverse events, 57.6 % were suspected to be drug-related, 13.8 % led to dose adjustment or permanent discontinuation and 40.2 % required concomitant medication. This novel combination approach led to an impressive PSA response rate of 37.7 % in CRPC patients. The good PSA response and PFS rate combined with the manageable toxicity profile suggest an alternative treatment option.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The study was funded by Novartis Pharma GmbH, Nuernberg, Germany. Amelie Ruebel, Katrin Birkholz, Katja Schmidt and Monika Baier are employees of Novartis Pharma GmbH and contributed to the set-up, conduct, and analysis of the study. The other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study design including the main inclusion and exclusion criteria. ECOG Eastern cooperative oncology group performance status, CRPC Castration-resistant prostate cancer, PSA Prostate-specific antigen, AE Adverse event, SAE Serious adverse event
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Proportion of patients discontinuing study drug. 1 patient is still ongoing (at the time of manuscript submission, Oct 2014). Pts Patients, PSA Prostate-specific antigen
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
PSA change during therapy. a Maximal PSA reduction compared to baseline for patients with PSA response, with stable disease and PSA progress. b the PSA change from baseline or LOCF. Patients with PSA response: black bars, patients with stable disease: grey bars, patients with PSA progress: white bars. PSA Prostate-specific antigen, LOCF Last observation carried forward, *Patients who entered the expansion phase of the study
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Resolution of bone lesions and evolution of PSA in an 80-year old patient. Bone lesions a before and b 12 months after therapy. c PSA level over time. PSA Prostate-specific antigen
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Quality of life: Emotional, social, physical and pain scores per visit. Emotional: squares, social: triangle, physical: circle, pain: N/N missing indicates the number of values/number of missing values
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Median progression-free survival (a) and overall survival (b). Circle Censored observation

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ryan CJ, Smith MR, de Bono JS, et al. Abiraterone in metastatic prostate cancer without previous chemotherapy. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(2):138–148. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Osanto S, Van Poppel H. Emerging novel therapies for advanced prostate cancer. Ther Adv Urol. 2012;4:3–12. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hurwitz M, Petrylak DP. Sequencing of agents for castration-resistant prostate cancer. Oncology (Williston Park) 2013;27(11):1144–1149. - PubMed
    1. Reichle A, Vogt T. Systems biology: a therapeutic target for tumor therapy. Cancer Microenviron. 2008;1:159–170. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jain G, Cronauer MV, Schrader M, et al. NF-κB signaling in prostate cancer: a promising therapeutic target? World J Urol. 2012;30:303–310. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources