Systematic review of cadaveric studies on anatomic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: the landmarks in anatomic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
- PMID: 25505700
- PMCID: PMC4258485
- DOI: 10.5792/ksrr.2014.26.4.191
Systematic review of cadaveric studies on anatomic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: the landmarks in anatomic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
Abstract
Recently, several new techniques for anatomic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (PCLR) have emerged and are believed to restore the normal anatomy of the posterior cruciate ligament more accurately. Despite the latest trend, the optimal methods for anatomic PCLR remain controversial. The purpose of this research is to review surgical techniques for PCLR in cadaver studies and suggest consistent and reproducible technical criteria. For the review of the literature, MEDLINE and EMBASE were screened for articles on anatomic PCLR. Only basic science studies on PCLR performed on human cadavers and written in English were included. Seventeen studies were included in this systematic review. Only the tunnel positions, graft types, and surgical techniques were reported in the majority of the studies. There were many variations of the reported tunnel positions, graft types, and surgical techniques among the studies. In most studies, surgical techniques for consistent and reproducible anatomic PCLR were not explained clearly. Therefore, high level medical research should be encouraged in order to establish standard surgical techniques for anatomic PCLR.
Keywords: Cadaveric study; Posterior cruciate ligament; Reconstruction.
Conflict of interest statement
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Transtibial or Tibial Inlay Techniques: A Meta-analysis of Biomechanical and Clinical Outcomes.Am J Sports Med. 2018 Sep;46(11):2789-2797. doi: 10.1177/0363546517725070. Epub 2018 Jan 12. Am J Sports Med. 2018. PMID: 29328888
-
Posterior cruciate ligament graft fixation angles, part 2: biomechanical evaluation for anatomic double-bundle reconstruction.Am J Sports Med. 2014 Oct;42(10):2346-55. doi: 10.1177/0363546514541226. Epub 2014 Aug 4. Am J Sports Med. 2014. PMID: 25091116
-
Suture Tape Augmentation of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Shows Improved Biomechanical Stability With Equivalent Outcome and Complication Rates: A Scoping Review.Arthroscopy. 2025 Mar;41(3):798-808.e0. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.03.025. Epub 2024 Mar 26. Arthroscopy. 2025. PMID: 38537724
-
Autograft Versus Allograft for Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Am J Sports Med. 2018 Jun;46(7):1752-1757. doi: 10.1177/0363546517713164. Epub 2017 Jun 21. Am J Sports Med. 2018. PMID: 28636429
-
Double-Bundle Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in 100 Patients at a Mean 3 Years' Follow-up: Outcomes Were Comparable to Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions.Am J Sports Med. 2018 Jul;46(8):1809-1818. doi: 10.1177/0363546517750855. Am J Sports Med. 2018. PMID: 29953296
Cited by
-
Inverted deltoid posterior cruciate ligament femoral insertion accompanied with medial synovial fold: a case of a complex posterior cruciate ligament anatomical variation recalcitrant to conservative treatment.Surg Radiol Anat. 2021 Oct;43(10):1667-1672. doi: 10.1007/s00276-021-02801-x. Epub 2021 Jul 14. Surg Radiol Anat. 2021. PMID: 34259889
-
No Clinically Important Difference in Knee Scores or Instability Between Transtibial and Inlay Techniques for PCL Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Apr;475(4):1239-1248. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5176-6. Epub 2016 Nov 28. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017. PMID: 27896678 Free PMC article.
-
Single-Bundle versus Double-Bundle Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Knee Surg Relat Res. 2017 Dec 1;29(4):246-255. doi: 10.5792/ksrr.17.050. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2017. PMID: 29172385 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Kim YM, Lee CA, Matava MJ. Clinical results of arthroscopic single-bundle transtibial posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39:425–434. - PubMed
-
- Markolf KL, Jackson SR, McAllister DR. Single- versus double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: effects of femoral tunnel separation. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38:1141–1146. - PubMed
-
- Fanelli GC, Beck JD, Edson CJ. Double bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: surgical technique and results. Sports Med Arthrosc. 2010;18:242–248. - PubMed
-
- Fanelli GC, Beck JD, Edson CJ. Arthroscopic double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgical technique. J Knee Surg. 2010;23:89–94. - PubMed
-
- Kohen RB, Sekiya JK. Single-bundle versus double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2009;25:1470–1477. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources