Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Dec;26(4):191-8.
doi: 10.5792/ksrr.2014.26.4.191. Epub 2014 Dec 2.

Systematic review of cadaveric studies on anatomic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: the landmarks in anatomic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Affiliations
Review

Systematic review of cadaveric studies on anatomic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: the landmarks in anatomic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Dong Yeong Lee et al. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2014 Dec.

Abstract

Recently, several new techniques for anatomic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (PCLR) have emerged and are believed to restore the normal anatomy of the posterior cruciate ligament more accurately. Despite the latest trend, the optimal methods for anatomic PCLR remain controversial. The purpose of this research is to review surgical techniques for PCLR in cadaver studies and suggest consistent and reproducible technical criteria. For the review of the literature, MEDLINE and EMBASE were screened for articles on anatomic PCLR. Only basic science studies on PCLR performed on human cadavers and written in English were included. Seventeen studies were included in this systematic review. Only the tunnel positions, graft types, and surgical techniques were reported in the majority of the studies. There were many variations of the reported tunnel positions, graft types, and surgical techniques among the studies. In most studies, surgical techniques for consistent and reproducible anatomic PCLR were not explained clearly. Therefore, high level medical research should be encouraged in order to establish standard surgical techniques for anatomic PCLR.

Keywords: Cadaveric study; Posterior cruciate ligament; Reconstruction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram for systematic review of the literature.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Femoral footprint of the posterior cruciate ligament (imaging was reconstructed using Geomagic Software). (A) a: AL bundle, b: PM bundle, c: medial bifurcate ridge, d: medial intercondylar notch. (B) Femoral footprint at three-dimensional reconstructed imaging. AL: anterolateral, PM: posteromedial.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Tibial footprint of posterior cruciate ligament (imaging was reconstructed using Geomagic Software). (A) a: AL bundle, b: PM bundle, c: posterior edge of shelf. (B) Tibial footprint at three-dimensional reconstructed imaging. AL: anterolateral, PM: posteromedial.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kim YM, Lee CA, Matava MJ. Clinical results of arthroscopic single-bundle transtibial posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39:425–434. - PubMed
    1. Markolf KL, Jackson SR, McAllister DR. Single- versus double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: effects of femoral tunnel separation. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38:1141–1146. - PubMed
    1. Fanelli GC, Beck JD, Edson CJ. Double bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: surgical technique and results. Sports Med Arthrosc. 2010;18:242–248. - PubMed
    1. Fanelli GC, Beck JD, Edson CJ. Arthroscopic double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgical technique. J Knee Surg. 2010;23:89–94. - PubMed
    1. Kohen RB, Sekiya JK. Single-bundle versus double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2009;25:1470–1477. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources