Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Nov;47(6):497-503.
doi: 10.5946/ce.2014.47.6.497. Epub 2014 Nov 30.

Endoscopic gastric cancer screening and surveillance in high-risk groups

Affiliations
Review

Endoscopic gastric cancer screening and surveillance in high-risk groups

Il Ju Choi. Clin Endosc. 2014 Nov.

Abstract

Gastric cancer remains a major cancer problem world-wide and future incidence will likely increase due to rapidly aging population demographics. Population-based screening is being undertaken in Korea and Japan, where gastric cancer incidence rates are high, and seems to be effective in reducing mortality from gastric cancer. However, such strategies are difficult to implement in countries with a low incidence or limited resources. Thus, screening strategies should be directed towards high-risk population subgroups. Gastric cancer has a relatively long mean sojourn time, and prognosis of early-stage disease is excellent. In general population, screening at 2-year interval in Korea seems to be effective for early-stage diagnosis. In subjects with atrophic gastritis or intestinal metaplasia, surveillance is recommended at 1 to 3 years intervals according to European and Japanese recommendation. Screening intervals for family members with sporadic gastric cancer has not yet been adequately evaluated, but 1-year interval is recommended for hereditary diffuse gastric cancer family-members. Gastric cancer patients treated by endoscopic resection are the highest-risk group, and 1-year interval surveillance can detect most metachronous gastric cancers at an early stage. Future gastric cancer surveillance strategies using endoscopy should be guided by risk-stratification assessment, and further refinement of optimal surveillance intervals is needed.

Keywords: Endoscopy; Screening; Stomach neoplasms; Surveillance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author has no financial conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. Epub 2014 Sep 13. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijc.29210. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jung KW, Won YJ, Kong HJ, Oh CM, Lee DH, Lee JS. Cancer statistics in Korea: incidence, mortality, survival, and prevalence in 2011. Cancer Res Treat. 2014;46:109–123. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Correa P. A human model of gastric carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 1988;48:3554–3560. - PubMed
    1. Fock KM, Talley N, Moayyedi P, et al. Asia-Pacific consensus guidelines on gastric cancer prevention. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;23:351–365. - PubMed
    1. Malfertheiner P, Megraud F, O'Morain CA, et al. Management of Helicobacter pylori infection: the Maastricht IV/ Florence Consensus Report. Gut. 2012;61:646–664. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources