Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Feb 28;3(2):e12.
doi: 10.1038/cti.2014.3. eCollection 2014 Feb.

Clinical immune-monitoring strategies for predicting infection risk in solid organ transplantation

Affiliations
Review

Clinical immune-monitoring strategies for predicting infection risk in solid organ transplantation

Mario Fernández-Ruiz et al. Clin Transl Immunology. .

Abstract

Infectious complications remain a leading cause of morbidity and mortality after solid organ transplantation (SOT), and largely depend on the net state of immunosuppression achieved with current regimens. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a major opportunistic viral pathogen in this setting. The application of strategies of immunological monitoring in SOT recipients would allow tailoring of immunosuppression and prophylaxis practices according to the individual's actual risk of infection. Immune monitoring may be pathogen-specific or nonspecific. Nonspecific immune monitoring may rely on either the quantification of peripheral blood biomarkers that reflect the status of a given arm of the immune response (serum immunoglobulins and complement factors, lymphocyte sub-populations, soluble form of CD30), or on the functional assessment of T-cell responsiveness (release of intracellular adenosine triphosphate following a mitogenic stimulus). In addition, various methods are currently available for monitoring pathogen-specific responses, such as CMV-specific T-cell-mediated immune response, based on interferon-γ release assays, intracellular cytokine staining or main histocompatibility complex-tetramer technology. This review summarizes the clinical evidence to date supporting the use of these approaches to the post-transplant immune status, as well as their potential limitations. Intervention studies based on validated strategies for immune monitoring still need to be performed.

Keywords: cell-mediated immunity; cytomegalovirus; immune-monitoring strategies; infection; prediction; solid organ transplantation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Cumulative incidences at month 6 post-transplant for overall bacterial infection, bloodstream infection (BSI) and acute pyelonephritis (APN) according to the serum IgG levels at month 1 in a prospective cohort of 271 kidney transplant recipients (modified from reference Fernández-Ruiz et al. plus personal data (Fernández-Ruiz M, 2013, unpublished data)).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Opportunistic infection-free survival in 82 liver transplant recipients according to the CD4+ T-cell count at month 1 post-transplant (P-value=0.0001; log-rank test) (Fernández-Ruiz M, 2013, unpublished data).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fishman JA, Issa NC. Infection in organ transplantation: risk factors and evolving patterns of infection. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2010;24:273–283. - PubMed
    1. Fishman JA, AST Infectious Diseases Community of Practice Introduction: infection in solid organ transplant recipients. Am J Transplant. 2009;9 (Suppl 4:S3–S6. - PubMed
    1. Kuypers DR. Immunosuppressive drug monitoring—what to use in clinical practice today to improve renal graft outcome. Transpl Int. 2005;18:140–150. - PubMed
    1. Fleming JN, Weimert NA. Novel strategies for immune monitoring in kidney transplant recipients. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2010;17:e63–e77. - PubMed
    1. Kuypers DR, Le Meur Y, Cantarovich M, Tredger MJ, Tett SE, Cattaneo D, et al. Consensus report on therapeutic drug monitoring of mycophenolic acid in solid organ transplantation. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;5:341–358. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources