Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014:2014:720385.
doi: 10.1155/2014/720385. Epub 2014 Nov 19.

Effect on intraocular pressure of switching from latanoprost and travoprost monotherapy to timolol fixed combinations in patients with normal-tension glaucoma

Affiliations

Effect on intraocular pressure of switching from latanoprost and travoprost monotherapy to timolol fixed combinations in patients with normal-tension glaucoma

Ryoko Igarashi et al. J Ophthalmol. 2014.

Abstract

Purpose. To evaluate the effect on intraocular pressure (IOP) of switching from latanoprost and travoprost monotherapy to timolol fixed combinations in Japanese patients with normal-tension glaucoma (NTG). Methods. 27 NTG patients (54 eyes) were compared IOP, superficial punctuate keratitis (SPK) scores, and conjunctival injection scores in eyes treated with prostaglandin (PG) or PG analog/beta-blocker (PG/b) fixed-combination 6 months after the change in therapy. Results. The mean baseline intraocular pressure was 17.4 ± 1.59 mmHg in eyes receiving PG therapy only and 17.4 ± 1.69 mmHg in eyes switched to PG/b. Switching to fixed combination therapy from PG monotherapy, the mean IOP was 13.1 ± 1.79 mmHg (P < 0.001) (-24.71% reduction from baseline) at 6 months. The mean conjunctival injection score was 0.69 for eyes on PG monotherapy and 0.56 for eyes on fixed combination therapy (P = 0.028). The mean SPK scores were 0.46 and 0.53. This difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.463). Conclusions. Switching from PG monotherapy to PG/b fixed combination therapy for NTG resulted in a greater intraocular pressure reduction than PG alone without increasing the number of instillations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 6

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Japan Glaucoma Society Glaucoma Diagnosis Guidelines Committee Glaucoma diagnosis guidelines. 2012;116(1):3–46. - PubMed
    1. De Moraes C. G., Liebmann J. M., Greenfield D. S., Gardiner S. K., Ritch R., Krupin T. Risk factors for visual field progression in the low-pressure glaucoma treatment study. The American Journal of Ophthalmology. 2012;154(4):702–711. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2012.04.015. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Krupin T., Liebmann J. M., Greenfield D. S., Ritch R., Gardiner S. Low-pressure Glaucoma Treatment Study Group: a randomized trial of brimonidine versus timolol in preserving visual function: results from the Low-Pressure Glaucoma Treatment Study. The American Journal of Ophthalmology. 2011;151(6):671–681. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.04.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fukuchi T., Wakai K., Suda K., Nakatsue T., Sawada H., Hara H., Ueda J., Tanaka T., Yamada A., Abe H. Incidence, severity and factors related to drug-induced keratoepitheliopathy with glaucoma medications. Clinical Ophthalmology. 2010;4(1):203–209. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fukuchi T., Yoshino T., Seki M., Tanaka T., Togano T., Ueda J., Hara H., Shirakashi M., Abe H. Improvement of glaucoma medication and the follow-up intraocular pressure in primary open-angle glaucomatous eyes in Japan. Folia Japonica de Ophthalmologica Clinica. 2011;4(3):209–215.

LinkOut - more resources