Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Nov;17(6):579-82.
doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.144609.

Evaluation of the apical sealing ability of bioceramic sealer, AH plus & epiphany: An in vitro study

Affiliations

Evaluation of the apical sealing ability of bioceramic sealer, AH plus & epiphany: An in vitro study

Suprit Sudhir Pawar et al. J Conserv Dent. 2014 Nov.

Abstract

Objective: This in vitro study evaluated and compared the microleakage of three sealers; Endosequence bioceramic (BC) sealer, AH Plus and Epiphany.

Materials and methods: Study was done on 75 extracted human single rooted permanent teeth, which were decoronated and the root canals were instrumented. The specimens were randomly divided into three groups (n = 25) and obturated by continuous wave condensation technique. Group A: using Endosequence BC, Group B: using AH Plus sealer, Group C: using Resilon Epiphany system. Microleakage was evaluated using dye penetration method. Teeth were split longitudinally and then horizontally markings were made at 2, 4 and 6 mm from the apex. Dye penetration evaluation was done under stereomicroscope (30X magnification).

Results: The dye penetration in Group B was more than in Group A and C in both vertical and horizontal directions, suggesting that newly introduced BC sealer and Epiphany sealer sealed the root canal better compared to AH Plus Sealer.

Conclusion: Newer root canal sealers seal the root canal better but cannot totally eliminate leakage.

Keywords: AH Plus; apical microleakage; bioceramic; epiphany; methylene blue; sealers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

References

    1. Ingle JI, Bakland LK, Baumgartner JC. 6th ed. Hamilton: BC Decker Inc; 2008. Ingle's Endodontics; pp. 1053–87.
    1. Nair U, Ghattas S, Saber M, Natera M, Walker C, Pileggi R. A comparative evaluation of the sealing ability of 2 root-end filling materials: An in vitro leakage study using Enterococcus faecalis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011;112:e74–7. - PubMed
    1. Drukteinis S, Peciuliene V, Maneliene R, Bendinskaite R. In vitro study of microbial leakage in roots filled with EndoREZ sealer/EndoREZ Points and AH Plus sealer/conventional gutta-percha points. Stomatologija. 2009;11:21–5. - PubMed
    1. Liviu S. Comparison of the interface dentin-endodontic sealer using two SEM magnifications. Rev Odonto Ciênc. 2010;25:296–9.
    1. Kossev D, Stefanov V. Ceramics-based sealers as new alternative to currently used endodontic sealers. Roots. 2009;1:42–8.

LinkOut - more resources