Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Feb;40(2):308-13.
doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.10.033. Epub 2014 Dec 13.

A systematic review of outcomes reporting for brachial plexus reconstruction

Affiliations

A systematic review of outcomes reporting for brachial plexus reconstruction

Christopher J Dy et al. J Hand Surg Am. 2015 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: To better understand the manner in which outcomes are reported after brachial plexus reconstruction, we conducted a systematic review of the scientific literature.

Methods: We included English-language articles describing treatment of brachial plexus injuries to restore motor function of the shoulder, elbow, forearm, and/or wrist with nerve repair, nerve graft, and/or nerve transfer. We recorded the anatomical location of injury, the treatment used, and the manner in which motor function, active and passive range of motion, pain, quality of life, function or disability, patient satisfaction, and psychosocial health was reported.

Results: In reviewing 88 papers with outcomes for 5,189 patients, 83 (94%) of the papers reported postoperative motor function. Of these, 49 (59%) did not include any other measures of patient outcome. Active range of motion was reported in 24 (27%) studies, pain was reported in 15 (17%) studies, quality of life was reported in 4 (5%) studies, function or disability was reported in 5 (6%) studies, patient satisfaction in 3 (3%) studies, and psychosocial health in 1 study.

Conclusions: To date, outcome reporting for brachial plexus surgery has largely centered on motor recovery and typically has not included measures of function or nonmusculoskeletal recovery. Incorporating currently used measures of physical recovery with patient-derived outcomes measures such as quality of life, function, pain, and satisfaction will likely help provide a more comprehensive understanding of the effect of brachial plexus reconstruction surgery.

Type of study/level of evidence: Diagnostic III.

Keywords: Brachial plexus; nerve repair; nerve transfer; outcomes; reporting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1:
FIGURE 1:
Flowchart demonstrating study selection for inclusion in systematic review.

Comment in

  • In Reply.
    Dy CJ, Lee SK, Mancuso CA, Wolfe SW. Dy CJ, et al. J Hand Surg Am. 2015 Jul;40(7):1504-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.04.030. J Hand Surg Am. 2015. PMID: 26095057 No abstract available.
  • Letter Regarding Outcome Reporting for Brachial Plexus Reconstruction.
    Hill B, Williams G, Olver J, Bialocerkowski A. Hill B, et al. J Hand Surg Am. 2015 Jul;40(7):1504. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.03.037. J Hand Surg Am. 2015. PMID: 26095058 No abstract available.

References

    1. Dorsi MJ, Hsu W, Belzberg AJ. Epidemiology of brachial plexus injury in the pediatric multitrauma population in the United States. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2010;5:573–577. - PubMed
    1. Midha R Epidemiology of brachial plexus injuries in a multitrauma population. Neurosurgery. 1997;40:1182–1188; discussion 1188–1189. - PubMed
    1. Calfee RP, Adams AA. Clinical research and patient-rated outcome measures in hand surgery. J Hand Surg Am. 2012;37:851–855. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Choi PD, Novak CB, Mackinnon SE, Kline DG. Quality of life and functional outcome following brachial plexus injury. J Hand Surg Am 1997;22:605–612. - PubMed
    1. Kretschmer T, Ihle S, Antoniadis G, Seidel JA, Heinen C, Borm W, et al. Patient satisfaction and disability after brachial plexus surgery. Neurosurgery. 2009;65:A189–196. - PubMed

Publication types