Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Dec 15;4(12):e005498.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005498.

Attitudes, access and anguish: a qualitative interview study of staff and patients' experiences of diabetic retinopathy screening

Affiliations

Attitudes, access and anguish: a qualitative interview study of staff and patients' experiences of diabetic retinopathy screening

A E Hipwell et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: To examine the experiences of patients, health professionals and screeners; their interactions with and understandings of diabetic retinopathy screening (DRS); and how these influence uptake.

Design: Purposive, qualitative design using multiperspectival, semistructured interviews and thematic analysis.

Setting: Three UK Screening Programme regions with different service-delivery modes, minority ethnic and deprivation levels across rural, urban and inner-city areas, in general practitioner practices and patients' homes.

Participants: 62 including 38 patients (22 regular-screening attenders, 16 non-regular attenders) and 24 professionals (15 primary care professionals and 9 screeners).

Results: Antecedents to attendance included knowledge about diabetic retinopathy and screening; antecedents to non-attendance included psychological, pragmatic and social factors. Confusion between photographs taken at routine eye tests and DRS photographs was identified. The differing regional invitation methods and screening locations were discussed, with convenience and transport safety being over-riding considerations for patients. Some patients mentioned significant pain and visual disturbance from mydriasis drops as a deterrent to attendance.

Conclusions: In this, the first study to consider multiperspectival experiential accounts, we identified that proactive coordination of care involving patients, primary care and screening programmes, prior to, during and after screening is required. Multiple factors, prior to, during and after screening, are involved in the attendance and non-attendance for DRS. Further research is needed to establish whether patient self-management educational interventions and the pharmacological reformulation of shorter acting mydriasis drops, may improve uptake of DRS. This might, in turn, reduce preventable vision loss and its associated costs to individuals and their families, and to health and social care providers, reducing current inequalities.

Keywords: PRIMARY CARE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SOCIAL MEDICINE; Screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Diabetic eye screening programme delivery modes (GP, general practitioner).

References

    1. WHO. Priorities and objectives—what do we want to achieve? 3.5.8 Diabetic retinopathy. Chapter in VISION 2020: The Right to Sight? 2004.
    1. World Health Organization, ed. Prevention of blindness and visual impairment (WHA59.25). Geneva, 2006.
    1. Resnikoff S, Pascolini D, Etya'ale D et al. . Global data on visual impairment in the year 2002. Bull World Health Organ 2004;82:844–51. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Scanlon P. The English national screening programme for sight-threatening diabeticretinopathy. J Med Screen 2008;15:1–4. 10.1258/jms.2008.008015 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Raman R, Rani P, Reddi Rachepalle S et al. . Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in India: Sankara Nethralaya Diabetic Retinopathy Epidemiology and Molecular Genetics Study report 2. Ophthalmology 2009;116:311–18. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.09.010 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources