Switching from intravenous to subcutaneous formulation of abatacept: a single-center Italian experience on efficacy and safety
- PMID: 25512476
- DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.141042
Switching from intravenous to subcutaneous formulation of abatacept: a single-center Italian experience on efficacy and safety
Abstract
Objective: Subcutaneous (SC) abatacept (ABA) is comparable to intravenous (IV) formulation in terms of efficacy and safety profile. Our work analyzed the switch to SC formulation from IV administration in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Methods: Fifty-one patients treated with SC ABA were included. Clinical data were obtained from clinical charts.
Results: Fourteen patients relapsed and needed to return to the IV administration. Neither clinical and laboratory features nor the previous therapies were identified as risk factors for SC formulation inefficacy. Disease activity decreased after the return to IV infusions.
Conclusion: SC ABA showed a risk of relapse in 27% of cases. The reinsertion of the IV administration quickly reinstated disease control.
Keywords: ABATACEPT; EFFICACY; RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS; SAFETY; SUBCUTANEOUS FORMULATION; THERAPY.
Comment in
-
Switching from Intravenous to Subcutaneous Formulation of Abatacept: Different Results in a Series of 21 Patients.J Rheumatol. 2015 Oct;42(10):1993-4. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.150230. J Rheumatol. 2015. PMID: 26429207 No abstract available.
-
Dr. Reggia, et al, reply.J Rheumatol. 2015 Oct;42(10):1995. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.150688. J Rheumatol. 2015. PMID: 26429209 No abstract available.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical