Research gaps in the care of women with female genital mutilation: an analysis
- PMID: 25514892
- DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.13217
Research gaps in the care of women with female genital mutilation: an analysis
Abstract
Female genital mutilation (FGM) includes procedures involving the partial or total removal of the external female genitals for non-therapeutic reasons. They can have negative psychosexual and health consequences that need specific care. In this paper, we review some key knowledge gaps in the clinical care of women with FGM, focusing on obstetric outcomes, surgical interventions (defibulation and clitoral reconstruction), and the skills and training of healthcare professionals involved in the prevention and management of FGM. We identify research priorities to improve the evidence necessary to establish guidelines for the best multidisciplinary care, communication, and prevention, and to improve health-promotion measures for women with FGM.
Keywords: Clitoral reconstruction; defibulation; female genital cutting; female genital mutilation; female genital mutilation/cutting; obstetric outcome.
© 2014 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.
Similar articles
-
The effectiveness of surgical interventions for women with FGM/C: a systematic review.BJOG. 2018 Feb;125(3):278-287. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14839. Epub 2017 Aug 28. BJOG. 2018. PMID: 28755440
-
Obstetric care of women with female genital mutilation attending a specialized clinic in a tertiary center.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016 Feb;132(2):174-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.06.055. Epub 2015 Oct 9. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016. PMID: 26493013
-
Clitoral reconstruction after female genital mutilation/cutting: case studies.J Sex Med. 2015 Jan;12(1):274-81. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12737. Epub 2014 Nov 25. J Sex Med. 2015. PMID: 25421071
-
Obstetric outcomes for women with female genital mutilation at an Australian hospital, 2006-2012: a descriptive study.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Oct 28;16(1):328. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-1123-5. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016. PMID: 27793119 Free PMC article.
-
Clitoral Reconstruction After Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: A Review of Surgical Techniques and Ethical Debate.J Sex Med. 2020 Mar;17(3):531-542. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.12.004. Epub 2020 Jan 10. J Sex Med. 2020. PMID: 31932257 Review.
Cited by
-
National Survey of US Plastic Surgeon Experience with Female Genital Mutilation.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 Mar 25;8(3):e2624. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002624. eCollection 2020 Mar. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020. PMID: 32537325 Free PMC article.
-
Postoperative Course of Reconstructive Procedures in FGM Type III-Proposal for a Modified Classification of Type III Female Genital Mutilation.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 2;20(5):4439. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054439. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023. PMID: 36901456 Free PMC article.
-
Health Care Providers' Readiness to Adopt an Interactive 3D Web App in Consultations About Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: Qualitative Evaluation of a Prototype.JMIR Form Res. 2023 Sep 28;7:e44696. doi: 10.2196/44696. JMIR Form Res. 2023. PMID: 37768712 Free PMC article.
-
Psychosexual Consequences of Female Genital Mutilation and the Impact of Reconstructive Surgery: A Narrative Review.Health Equity. 2019 Feb 20;3(1):36-46. doi: 10.1089/heq.2018.0036. eCollection 2019. Health Equity. 2019. PMID: 30805570 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Health sector involvement in the management of female genital mutilation/cutting in 30 countries.BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Apr 4;18(1):240. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3033-x. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018. PMID: 29615033 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical