Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 May;69(5):558-64.
doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2014.270. Epub 2014 Dec 17.

Validity and reliability of the new Canadian Nutrition Screening Tool in the 'real-world' hospital setting

Affiliations

Validity and reliability of the new Canadian Nutrition Screening Tool in the 'real-world' hospital setting

M Laporte et al. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2015 May.

Abstract

Background/objectives: Nutrition screening should be initiated on hospital admission by non-dietitians. This research aimed to validate and assess the reliability of the Canadian Nutrition Screening Tool (CNST) in the 'real-world' hospital setting.

Subjects/methods: Adult patients were admitted to surgical and medical wards only (no palliative patients). Study 1--Nutrition Care in Canadian Hospitals (n=1014): development of the CNST (3 items: weight loss, decrease food intake, body mass index (BMI)) and exploratory assessment of its criterion and predictive validity. Study 2--Inter-rater reliability and criterion validity assessment of the tool completed by untrained nursing personnel or diet technician (DT) (n=150). Subjective Global Assessment performed by site coordinators was used as a gold standard for comparison.

Results: Study 1: The CNST completed by site coordinators showed good sensitivity (91.7%) and specificity (74.8%). Study 2: In the subsample of untrained personnel (160 nurses; one DT), tool's reliability was excellent (Kappa=0.88), sensitivity was good (>90%) but specificity was low (47.8%). However, using a two-item ('yes' on both weight change and food intake) version of the tool improved the specificity (85.9%). BMI was thus removed to promote feasibility. The final two-item tool (study 1 sample) has a good predictive validity: length of stay (P<0.001), 30-day readmission (P=0.02; X(2) 5.92) and mortality (P<0.001).

Conclusions: The simple and reliable CNST shows good sensitivity and specificity and significantly predicts adverse outcomes. Completion by several untrained nursing personnel confirms its utility in the nursing admission assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Nutr Clin Pract. 2013 Dec;28(6):730-6 - PubMed
    1. Can J Diet Pract Res. 2001 Spring;62(1):26-34 - PubMed
    1. Clin Nutr. 2012 Apr;31(2):206-11 - PubMed
    1. J Gerontol Nurs. 2012 Jun;38(6):38-45 - PubMed
    1. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2012 May;36(3):292-8 - PubMed

Publication types