Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Apr;29(4):354-62.
doi: 10.1177/0269216314560208. Epub 2014 Dec 17.

Doctors' and nurses' views and experience of transferring patients from critical care home to die: a qualitative exploratory study

Affiliations

Doctors' and nurses' views and experience of transferring patients from critical care home to die: a qualitative exploratory study

Maureen Coombs et al. Palliat Med. 2015 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Dying patients would prefer to die at home, and therefore a goal of end-of-life care is to offer choice regarding where patients die. However, whether it is feasible to offer this option to patients within critical care units and whether teams are willing to consider this option has gained limited exploration internationally.

Aim: To examine current experiences of, practices in and views towards transferring patients in critical care settings home to die.

Design: Exploratory two-stage qualitative study

Setting/participants: Six focus groups were held with doctors and nurses from four intensive care units across two large hospital sites in England, general practitioners and community nurses from one community service in the south of England and members of a Patient and Public Forum. A further 15 nurses and 6 consultants from critical care units across the United Kingdom participated in follow-on telephone interviews.

Findings: The practice of transferring critically ill patients home to die is a rare event in the United Kingdom, despite the positive view of health care professionals. Challenges to service provision include patient care needs, uncertain time to death and the view that transfer to community services is a complex, highly time-dependent undertaking.

Conclusion: There are evidenced individual and policy drivers promoting high-quality care for all adults approaching the end of life encompassing preferred place of death. While there is evidence of this choice being honoured and delivered for some of the critical care population, it remains debatable whether this will become a conventional practice in end of life in this setting.

Keywords: Critical care; doctors and nurses; end-of-life care; transfer home.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interests: None.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Department of Health. Gold standards framework: a programme for community palliative care, http://www.goldstandardsframework.org.uk/ (accessed 21 February 2014).
    1. Department of Health. End-of-life care programme progress report summary, http://www.endoflifecare.nhs.uk (2006, accessed 23 October 13).
    1. Department of Health. End of life strategy – providing high quality of care for all adults at end of life. London: Department of Health, https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/fil... (2008, accessed 4 January 2014).
    1. Tellett L, Davis C. Case 43. Fulfilling a patient’s wish to go home from intensive care. Eur J Palliat Care 2009; 16: 69–70.
    1. Kumar G, Obuch S, Vyakarnam P. Withdrawal of intensive care treatment at home – ‘a good death’. Anaesth Intensive Care 2009; 37: 484–486. - PubMed

Publication types