The epidemiology of reoperations for orthopaedic trauma
- PMID: 25519265
- PMCID: PMC4473898
- DOI: 10.1308/003588414X14055925059318
The epidemiology of reoperations for orthopaedic trauma
Abstract
Introduction: The Royal College of Surgeons of England (RCS) has issued guidance regarding the use of reoperation rates in the revalidation of UK-based orthopaedic surgeons. Currently, little has been published concerning acceptable rates of reoperation following primary surgical management of orthopaedic trauma, particularly with reference to revalidation.
Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of patients undergoing clearly defined reoperations following primary surgical management of trauma between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2011. A full case note review was undertaken to establish the demographics, clinical course and context of reoperation. A review of the imaging was performed to establish whether the procedure performed was in line with accepted trauma practice and whether the technical execution was acceptable.
Results: A total of 3,688 patients underwent primary procedures within the time period studied while 70 (1.90%, 99% CI: 1.39-2.55) required an unplanned reoperation. Thirty-nine (56%) of these patients were male. The mean age of patients was 56 years (range: 18-98 years) and there was a median time to reoperation of 50 days (IQR: 13-154 days). Potentially avoidable reoperations occurred in 41 patients (58.6%, 99% CI: 43.2-72.6). This was largely due to technical errors (40 patients, 57.1%, 99% CI: 41.8-71.3), representing 1.11% (99% CI: 0.73-1.64) of the total trauma workload. Within RCS guidelines, 28-day reoperation rates for hip, wrist and ankle fractures were 1.4% (99% CI: 0.5-3.3), 3.5% (99% CI: 0.8%-12.1) and 1.86% (99% CI: 0.4-6.6) respectively.
Conclusions: We present novel work that has established baseline reoperation rates for index procedures required for revalidation of orthopaedic surgeons.
Figures
References
-
- Royal College of Surgeons of England. Using Outcomes Information for Revalidation in Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery. London: RCS; 2011.
-
- Britton E, Chambers C, Ashmore A. Orthopaedic procedure coding. Does accuracy matter? Int J Health Care Qual Assur 2009; 22: 441–447. - PubMed
-
- Head RF, Byrom A, Ellison GT. Qualitative exploration of the production of Hospital Episode Statistics in a Guernsey hospital: implications for regional comparisons of UK health data. Health Serv Manage Res 2008; 21: 178–184. - PubMed
-
- National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Hip Fracture. London: NICE; 2011.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Molecular Biology Databases
