Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1988 Dec;27(6):699-717.
doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(88)90016-2.

Accessing Sentence Participants: The Advantage of First Mention

Morton Ann Gernsbacher  1 , David J Hargreaves  1
Affiliations

Accessing Sentence Participants: The Advantage of First Mention

Morton Ann Gernsbacher et al. J Mem Lang. 1988 Dec.

Abstract

We investigate the following finding concerning the order in which participants are mentioned in sentences: In a probe recognition task, probe words are responded to considerably more rapidly when they are the names of the first- as opposed to the second-mentioned participants. Seven experiments demonstrated that this advantage is not attributable to the tendency in English for first-mentioned participants to be semantic agents; neither is it due to the fact that in many of our experiments, the first-mentioned participants were also the initial words of their stimulus sentences. Furthermore, the advantage is not attenuated when the first- and second-mentioned participants share syntactic subjecthood, or even when the first-mentioned participants are not the syntactic subjects. In sum, the effect does not appear to be attributable to linguistic factors. We suggest instead that it is the result of cognitive processes: Building a coherent mental representation requires first laying a foundation and then mapping subsequent information onto the developing representation. First-mentioned participants are more accessible because they form the foundations for their sentence. Level representations and because it is through them that subsequent information gets mapped onto the developing representations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Subject’s average correct response times from Experiment 1.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Subject’s average correct response times from Experiment 3.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Subject’s average correct response times from Experiment 5.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Subject’s average correct response times from Experiment 6.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Subject’s average correct response times from Experiment 7.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Aaronson D, Ferres S. Lexical categories and reading tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 1983;9:675–699.
    1. Aaronson D, Scarborough HS. Performance theories for sentence coding: Some quantitative evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 1976;2:56–70.
    1. Anisfeld M, Klenbort I. On the functions of structural paraphrase: The view from the passive voice. Psychological Bulletin. 1973;79:117–126.
    1. Bates E, MacWhtnney B. Functionalist approaches to grammar. In: Wanner E, Gleitman LR, editors. Language acquisition: The state of the art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1982. pp. 173–218.
    1. Bock JK. Toward a cognitive psychology of syntax: Information processing contributions to sentence formulation. Psychological Review. 1982;89:1–7.

LinkOut - more resources