Stepwise Approach for the Prescription of Opiates for Non-Cancer Pain: A Review of Clinical Evidence and Guidelines [Internet]
- PMID: 25520999
- Bookshelf ID: NBK263396
Stepwise Approach for the Prescription of Opiates for Non-Cancer Pain: A Review of Clinical Evidence and Guidelines [Internet]
Excerpt
The terms opiate and opioid are often used interchangeably. Opiates are medications derived from opium poppy such as morphine and codeine, while opioids refer to opium-like substances including endogenous substances such as endorphins, as well as exogenous synthetic drugs that interact with opioid receptors. The generic term “Opioid” (including opiates and opioids) is therefore the preferred term for use throughout this report.
In Canada, the prescription of opioids for pain management increased by about 50% between 2000 and 2004. The increase in prescribing of opioids has been associated with increase in misuse, abuse, diversion, and opioid-related overdoses that are accompanied by increasing emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and deaths. In 2008, the prevalence of any use of opioid pain relievers in general population in Canada was 21.6%. In 2011, the rate was decreased to 16.7%. There was an almost 250% increase in the number of emergency visits in Ontario related to narcotics withdrawal, overdose, intoxication, harmful use and other related diagnoses from 2005–2006 to 2010–2011.
Given the current rate of opioid overdose and harms associated with opioid use, stepwise approaches to prescribing, which progress from non-opioids to weak opioids and finally strong opioids such as hyrdomorphone if pain persists, have been proposed. As such, there is a growing need for clinical evidence and guidance for the use of stepwise approaches for the prescription of opioid for non-cancer pain management in the emergency department and in-hospital setting.
Copyright © 2014 Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health.
Sections
- CONTEXT AND POLICY ISSUES
- RESEARCH QUESTIONS
- KEY FINDINGS
- METHODS
- SUMMARY OF EVIDENCE
- CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR DECISION OR POLICY MAKING
- REFERENCES
- APPENDIX 1 AMSTAR Checklist for the Quality Assessment of Systematic Reviews
- APPENDIX 2 Checklist for the Quality Assessment of Guidelines (AGREE II)
- APPENDIX 3 Selection of Included Studies
- APPENDIX 4 Characteristics of the Systematic Review of Guidelines by Nuckols et al. (2014)
- APPENDIX 5 Summary of Critical Appraisal of Systematic Review by Nuckols et al. (2014) Using AMSTAR
- APPENDIX 6 Summary of Critical Appraisal of ACEP Guidelines Using AGREE II
- APPENDIX 7 Summary of Findings of the Systematic Review of Guidelines by Nuckols et al. (2014)
- APPENDIX 8 Summary of Recommendations of the Guidelines of the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) by Cantrill et al. (2012)
- APPENDIX 9 Grading of Recommendations and Levels of Evidence
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials