Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Apr;172(8):2026-50.
doi: 10.1111/bph.13042. Epub 2015 Feb 27.

Opioid receptors and cardioprotection - 'opioidergic conditioning' of the heart

Affiliations
Review

Opioid receptors and cardioprotection - 'opioidergic conditioning' of the heart

John P Headrick et al. Br J Pharmacol. 2015 Apr.

Abstract

Ischaemic heart disease (IHD) remains a major cause of morbidity/mortality globally, firmly established in Westernized or 'developed' countries and rising in prevalence in developing nations. Thus, cardioprotective therapies to limit myocardial damage with associated ischaemia-reperfusion (I-R), during infarction or surgical ischaemia, is a very important, although still elusive, clinical goal. The opioid receptor system, encompassing the δ (vas deferens), κ (ketocyclazocine) and μ (morphine) opioid receptors and their endogenous opioid ligands (endorphins, dynorphins, enkephalins), appears as a logical candidate for such exploitation. This regulatory system may orchestrate organism and organ responses to stress, induces mammalian hibernation and associated metabolic protection, triggers powerful adaptive stress resistance in response to ischaemia/hypoxia (preconditioning), and mediates cardiac benefit stemming from physical activity. In addition to direct myocardial actions, central opioid receptor signalling may also enhance the ability of the heart to withstand I-R injury. The δ- and κ-opioid receptors are strongly implicated in cardioprotection across models and species (including anti-infarct and anti-arrhythmic actions), with mixed evidence for μ opioid receptor-dependent protection in animal and human tissues. A small number of clinical trials have provided evidence of cardiac benefit from morphine or remifentanil in cardiopulmonary bypass or coronary angioplasty patients, although further trials of subtype-specific opioid receptor agonists are needed. The precise roles and utility of this GPCR family in healthy and diseased human myocardium, and in mediating central and peripheral survival responses, warrant further investigation, as do the putative negative influences of ageing, IHD co-morbidities, and relevant drugs on opioid receptor signalling and protective responses.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Diagram summarizing the temporal characteristics of pre- and post-conditioning stimuli (direct and remote), opioid receptor involvement, effects on myocardial I–R outcomes and the potential influences of common co-morbidities. References: 1, Schultz et al., ; 2, Schultz et al., ; 3, Wang et al., ; 4, Weinbrenner et al., ; 5, Zhang et al., ; 6, Wang et al., ; 7, Jang et al., ; 8, Zatta et al., ; 9, Peart et al., ; 10, Gross et al., ; 11, Wong & Lee, ; 12, Peart & Gross, ; 13, Peart & Gross, .
Figure 2
Figure 2
Intracellular signal paths coupled to the opioid receptors and implicated in cardiac stress signalling and cardioprotection. Receptor agonism leads to activation of PI3K/Akt and RISK pathway components (including PKs A, B, C and G), MAPKs (ERK, p38), ROS generation, JAK-STAT signalling, phospho-regulation of effector molecules such as GSK3β and connexin-43, and activation of mitochondrial KATP and KCa channels. These paths may converge on inhibition of the mPTP to preserve mitochondrial integrity and function. Not shown opioid receptor-coupled signal paths also affect expression/translocation of pro- and anti-apoptotic proteins, including Bax and Bcl-2, and opioid receptors may additionally participate in activation of the cardioprotective survivor activating factor enhancement (SAFE) pathway (involving TNF-α-dependent activation of STAT3 signalling).

References

    1. Abdel-Wahab M, Khattab AA, Liska B, Kassner G, Geist V, Toelg R, et al. Diazepam versus fentanyl for premedication during percutaneous coronary intervention: results from the Myocardial Protection by Fentanyl during Coronary Intervention (PROFIT) Trial. J Interv Cardiol. 2008;21:232–238. - PubMed
    1. Abete P, Ferrara N, Cacciatore F, Madrid A, Bianco S, Calabrese C, et al. Angina-induced protection against myocardial infarction in adult and elderly patients: a loss of preconditioning mechanism in the aging heart? J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30:947–954. - PubMed
    1. Addison PD, Neligan PC, Ashrafpour H, Khan A, Zhong A, Moses M, et al. Noninvasive remote ischemic preconditioning for global protection of skeletal muscle against infarction. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2003;285:H1435–H1443. - PubMed
    1. Alexander SPH, Benson HE, Faccenda E, Pawson AJ, Sharman JL, Spedding M, et al. The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2013/14: G Protein-Coupled Receptors. Br J Pharmacol. 2013a;170:1459–1581. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alexander SPH, Benson HE, Faccenda E, Pawson AJ, Sharman JL, Spedding M, et al. The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2013/14: Catalytic Receptors. Br J Pharmacol. 2013b;170:1676–1705. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms