Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jan-Feb;19(1):52-7.
doi: 10.1016/j.bjid.2014.09.006. Epub 2014 Dec 15.

Late onset sepsis in newborn babies: epidemiology and effect of a bundle to prevent central line associated bloodstream infections in the neonatal intensive care unit

Affiliations

Late onset sepsis in newborn babies: epidemiology and effect of a bundle to prevent central line associated bloodstream infections in the neonatal intensive care unit

Daiane Silva Resende et al. Braz J Infect Dis. 2015 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

Aim: We assessed late onset sepsis (LOS) rates of neonates in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) before and after implementing an evidence-based bundle to prevent these infections in a country with poor resources.

Methods: We evaluate trends of LOS between October 2010 and August 2012 in a large tertiary hospital in Brazil. We designed a protocol based of CDC guidelines for insertion of maintenance of central venous catheter targeted to reduction of bloodstream infections. During this period two major events occurred: a great increase of LOS rates in January months and relocation of the unit to a provisory place. Additionally we evaluated the risk factors and etiology of these infections.

Results: A total of 112 (20.3%) cases defined as LOS were found. The overall incidence rate of LOS in the study was 16.1/1000 patient/days and 23.0/1000 CVC-days. Our monthly rates data of LOS/1000 patient-day reveal fluctuations over the studied period, with incidence rates of these infections in staff vacation period (January 2011 and 2012) significantly higher (59.6/1000 patients-days) than compared with the other months rates (16.6/1000 patients-days) (IRR=3.59; p<0.001). As opposite, the incidence rates of LOS during relocation period was lower (10.3/1000 patients-days) when compared with baseline period 26.7/1000 patients-days (IRR=2.59; p=0.007). After the intervention period, these rates decreased in the post intervention period, when compared with preintervention 14.7/1000 patients-days and 23.4/1000 patients-days, respectively (IRR=1.59; p=0.04).

Conclusion: Through simple infection control measures, LOS can be successfully controlled especially in NICUs of limited resources countries such as ours.

Keywords: Bundle; Late onset sepsis; Neonates.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Monthly rates of late onset-sepsis per 1000 patient-days and per 1000 CVC-days from October 2010 to August 2012. LOS, late-onset sepsis; UAL, upper alert limit; UCL, upper control limit.

References

    1. Stoll B.J., Hansen N., Fanaroff A.A., et al. Late-onset sepsis in very low birth weight neonates: the experience of the NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Pediatrics. 2002;110:285–291. - PubMed
    1. Manzoni P., De Luca D., Stronati M., et al. Prevention of nosocomial infections in neonatal intensive care units. Am J Perinatol. 2013;30:81–88. - PubMed
    1. Landre-Peigne C., Ka A.S., Peigne V., Bougere J., Seye M.N., Imbert P. Efficacy of an infection control programme in reducing nosocomial bloodstream infections in a Senegalese neonatal unit. J Hosp Infect. 2011;79:161–165. - PubMed
    1. Resende D.S., JM O., Brito D., Abdallah V.O., Gontijo Filho P.P. Reduction of catheter-associated bloodstream infections through procedures in newborn babies admitted in a university hospital intensive care unit in Brazil. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2011;44:731–734. - PubMed
    1. Orsi G.B., Franchi C., Marrone R., Giordano A., Rocco M., Venditti M. Laboratory confirmed bloodstream infection aetiology in an intensive care unit: eight years study. Ann Ig. 2012;24:269–278. - PubMed

Publication types