Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Apr;36(4):803-10.
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4192. Epub 2014 Dec 18.

Characterizing the location of spinal and vertebral levels in the human cervical spinal cord

Affiliations

Characterizing the location of spinal and vertebral levels in the human cervical spinal cord

D W Cadotte et al. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015 Apr.

Abstract

Background and purpose: Advanced MR imaging techniques are critical to understanding the pathophysiology of conditions involving the spinal cord. We provide a novel, quantitative solution to map vertebral and spinal cord levels accounting for anatomic variability within the human spinal cord. For the first time, we report a population distribution of the segmental anatomy of the cervical spinal cord that has direct implications for the interpretation of advanced imaging studies most often conducted across groups of subjects.

Materials and methods: Twenty healthy volunteers underwent a T2-weighted, 3T MRI of the cervical spinal cord. Two experts marked the C3-C8 cervical nerve rootlets, C3-C7 vertebral bodies, and pontomedullary junction. A semiautomated algorithm was used to locate the centerline of the spinal cord and measure rostral-caudal distances from a fixed point in the brain stem, the pontomedullary junction, to each of the spinal rootlets and vertebral bodies. Distances to each location were compared across subjects. Six volunteers had 2 additional scans in neck flexion and extension to measure the effects of patient positioning in the scanner.

Results: We demonstrated that substantial variation exists in the rostral-caudal position of spinal cord segments among individuals and that prior methods of predicting spinal segments are imprecise. We also show that neck flexion or extension has little effect on the relative location of vertebral-versus-spinal levels.

Conclusions: Accounting for spinal level variation is lacking in existing imaging studies. Future studies should account for this variation for accurate interpretation of the neuroanatomic origin of acquired MR signals.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1.
Fig 1.
Results of spinal cord centerline extraction in 1 subject. The red line represents the spinal cord centerline. Distance from the PMJ is calculated along this centerline (z, in millimeters), for measuring the absolute location of the vertebral and spinal levels.
Fig 2.
Fig 2.
From left to right: T2-weighted MR image with the PMJ and superior (Sup.) and inferior (inf.) endplates of the C3 vertebral body marked with dashed white lines. Immediately adjacent to this, an artist's illustration demonstrates how person-specific markings are positioned relative to the individualized arc-length axis of the spinal cord (red line). Thus, distances can be compared across individuals along their personalized spinal cord axes. The T2-weighted coronal image depicts spinal rootlets (A) and the gap between adjacent segmental rootlets (B), delineated by dashed white lines. The far right artist's illustration depicts segmental rootlets and the formation of a spinal nerve root that emerges from the intervertebral foramen. To accurately localize segmental nerve rootlets, we followed the spinal nerve root that emerges from the intervertebral foramen of the respective vertebral body.
Fig 3.
Fig 3.
Nerve rootlet (NR, solid lines) and vertebral body (VB, dashed lines) distributions across our cohort of 20 individuals. The x-axis of this line graph represents the distance from the PMJ along the spinal cord axis, where zero is the PMJ and the increasing numbers are millimeter distances down the curved axis of the spinal cord to the midpoint of either the vertebral body or spinal cord segment as demarcated by nerve rootlets. The y-axis of the line graph represents the probability of finding either NR (solid line) or VB (dashed line) at a given distance down the curved spinal cord. The spinal cord segments and vertebral bodies represented by the colored lines are shown in the graph inset as distances in millimeters to the midpoint of either the vertebral bodies or spinal cord segments (as represented by nerve rootlets), projected orthogonally onto the spinal cord centerline, SDs, and range. The rostral-caudal extent of nerve rootlets corresponding to each spinal segment was relatively consistent across all spinal cord segments. The average length of spinal cord segments are the following: C3, 10.5 mm; C4, 9.9 mm; C5, 10.5 mm; C6, 9.7 mm; C7, 9.4 mm; and C8 9.6 mm.
Fig 4.
Fig 4.
Vertebral body and spinal cord segment location across 10 subjects enrolled in this study. Vertebral bodies are represented for each subject by light-shaded bars, whereas spinal cord segments are represented by colored bars (see graph inset).
Fig 5.
Fig 5.
Left: scaled relative distance of the C7 spinal cord segments (red bars) from the C6 (upper light-brown-shaded area) and C7 (lower light-brown-shaded area) vertebral bodies. When we visualize an individual's cervical spine MR imaging, we tend to hold the vertebral bodies constant. This figure illustrates that the position of the seventh cervical spinal cord segment varies relative to the position of the vertebral body across a cohort of individuals. If one were to assume that the C7 spinal segments are immediately adjacent to the C7 vertebral body, then 0% of the actual segments would be captured in such an analysis. Similarly, if one were to assume that the C7 spinal cord segments are 1 vertebral body length rostral to the C7 body, then one would capture 33% of the corresponding spinal segments for the 10 subjects shown, or 44% of the corresponding spinal segments across all 20 subjects. Depending on the goals of the imaging experiment, one should pay careful attention to the relative position of spinal segments and vertebral bodies across a cohort of individuals. Assuming that spinal segments are constant may lead to false-positive or false-negative results. Right: an artist's depiction shows the range in spinal cord segments relative to the vertebral bodies; light-shaded areas represent areas of population level overlap.
Fig 6.
Fig 6.
Automated analysis of the degree of neck flexion/extension of a subject. Top: the angle between the tangent of the spinal cord at any point and tangent at the C7 vertebral body for 1 subject with the neck in flexion (red) and extension (blue). Bottom: the difference between the flexion and extension curves or the maximum extent of curvature of the spinal cord at various locations down the longitudinal axis of the spinal cord (x-axis). VB indicates vertebral body; deg, degree; deg diff, degree difference.

References

    1. Cohen-Adad J, El Mendili MM, Lehericy S, et al. Demyelination and degeneration in the injured human spinal cord detected with diffusion and magnetization transfer MRI. Neuroimage 2011;55:1024–33 - PubMed
    1. Cadotte DW, Bosma R, Mikulis D, et al. Plasticity of the injured human spinal cord: insights revealed by spinal cord functional MRI. PLoS One 2012;7:e45560. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Okado N. Onset of synapse formation in the human spinal cord. J Comp Neurol 1981;201:211–19 - PubMed
    1. Cabezas M, Oliver A, Lladó X, et al. A review of atlas-based segmentation for magnetic resonance brain images. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2011;104:e158–77 - PubMed
    1. Evans AC, Janke AL, Collins DL, et al. Brain templates and atlases. Neuroimage 2012;62:911–22 - PubMed