Analysis of sentinel node biopsy combined with other diagnostic tools in staging cN0 head and neck cancer: A diagnostic meta-analysis

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this was to find a staging strategy sensitive enough to reduce the risk of occult metastases in cN0 head and neck cancer to below 15% to 20%.

Methods: A total of 73 articles were selected for analysis of the diagnostic performance in staging cN0 head and neck cancer. Hypothetical estimation of negative predictive value (NPV) was calculated based on the Bayesian theory.

Results: The pooled estimates for sensitivity were 56.4% and 84.9% for ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and sentinel node biopsy (SNB). The pooled estimates for sensitivity were 47.0%, 56.6%, 48.3%, and 63.3% for CT, MRI, positron emission tomography (PET), and ultrasound, respectively. The pooled estimates for specificity were 88.9%, 82.5%, 86.2%, and 79.1% for CT, MRI, PET, and ultrasound. In estimation, the CT or MRI with SNB strategies had NPV higher than 85% even when the pretest metastatic rate was 60%.

Conclusion: The SNB procedure has the best performance. A combination of CT/MRI and SNB for cN0 head and neck cancer is preferred.

Keywords: N0 neck; head and neck carcinoma; meta-analysis; review; sentinel node biopsy.