Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jan;5(1):84-89.
doi: 10.1177/1754073912451350.

Categorical Perception for Emotional Faces

Affiliations

Categorical Perception for Emotional Faces

Jennifer M B Fugate. Emot Rev. 2013 Jan.

Abstract

Categorical perception (CP) refers to how similar things look different depending on whether they are classified as the same category. Many studies demonstrate that adult humans show CP for human emotional faces. It is widely debated whether the effect can be accounted for solely by perceptual differences (structural differences among emotional faces) or whether additional perceiver-based conceptual knowledge is required. In this review, I discuss the phenomenon of CP and key studies showing CP for emotional faces. I then discuss a new model of emotion which highlights how perceptual and conceptual knowledge interact to explain how people see discrete emotions in others' faces. In doing so, I discuss how language (emotion words included in the paradigm) contribute to CP.

Keywords: categorical perception; emotional faces; language.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Morphs from anger to fear created at 10% intervals. Participants who perceive these faces in a categorical fashion identify morphs in two discrete groups with consistency. Participants typically identify morphs 1–5 as angry and morphs 6–10 as fearful (given the two emotion words). Given such identification, the categorical boundary would be between morphs 5 and 6.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Example of an AB-X discrimination trial. Participants see morph A, then morph B, then are asked to indicate whether morph X is either A or B. Here X is B.

References

    1. Angeli A, Davidoff J, Valentine T. Face familiarity, distinctiveness, and categorical perception. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 2008;61:690–707. - PubMed
    1. Barrett LF. Emotions as natural kinds? Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2006a;1:28–58. - PubMed
    1. Barrett LF. Solving the emotion paradox: Categorization and the experience of emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Review. 2006b;10:20–46. - PubMed
    1. Barrett LF, Lindquist K, Gendron M. Language as context for the perception of emotion. Trends in Cognitive Science. 2007;11:327–332. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beale JM, Keil FC. Categorical effects in the perception of faces. Cognition. 1995;57:217–239. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources