Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2015 Feb;46(2):315-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.10.050. Epub 2014 Oct 22.

Significance of clinical examination, CT and MRI scan in the diagnosis of posterior pelvic ring fractures

J V Nüchtern  1 , M J Hartel  2 , F O Henes  3 , M Groth  3 , S Y Jauch  4 , J Haegele  5 , D Briem  2 , M Hoffmann  2 , W Lehmann  2 , J M Rueger  2 , L G Großterlinden  2
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Significance of clinical examination, CT and MRI scan in the diagnosis of posterior pelvic ring fractures

J V Nüchtern et al. Injury. 2015 Feb.

Abstract

Introduction: Patients with a fracture in the anterior pelvic ring often simultaneously demonstrate pain in the posterior pelvic ring. The aim of the present prospective study was to assess the sensitivity of CT, MRI and clinical examination in the detection of fractures in the posterior pelvic ring in patients with fractures of the anterior pelvic ring diagnosed in conventional radiographs.

Methods: Sixty patients with radiographic signs of an anterior pelvic ring injury were included in this prospective analysis. Following a focused clinical examination of the posterior pelvis, all patients underwent both a CT and then a MRI scan of their pelvis. Two board certified radiologists evaluated the CT and MRI scans independently. To estimate the presence of osteoporosis the Hounsfield units of the vertebral body of L5 were measured in each case.

Results: Fifty-three women and seven men, with a mean age of 74.7+/-15.6 years were included into the study. A fracture of the posterior pelvic ring was found in fourty-eight patients (80%) patients using MRI. Fractures of the posterior pelvic ring would have been missed in eight cases (17%), if only CT had been used. Eighty-five percent of the patients with a posterior fracture had an osteoporosis. The majority of the cases suffered from a low energy trauma. Thirty-eight patients (83%) with positive clinical signs at the posterior pelvic ring actually had a fracture of the posterior pelvic ring in the MRI. The clinical examination proved to be equally effective to CT in detecting posterior pelvic ring fractures.

Conclusion: The significance of both, clinical examination and CT was confirmed in the detection of fractures in the posterior pelvic ring. MRI examination of the pelvis however, was found to be superior in detecting undislocated fractures in a cohort of patients with a high incidence of osteoporosis. Using MRI may be beneficial in select cases, especially when reduced bone density is suspected.

Keywords: CT; Clinical examination; Elderly; MRI; Osteoporosis; Pelvic ring fractures.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms