Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2015 Jan;3(1):24-32.
doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(14)70291-7. Epub 2014 Dec 17.

Mesenchymal stem (stromal) cells for treatment of ARDS: a phase 1 clinical trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Mesenchymal stem (stromal) cells for treatment of ARDS: a phase 1 clinical trial

Jennifer G Wilson et al. Lancet Respir Med. 2015 Jan.

Abstract

Background: No effective pharmacotherapy for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) exists, and mortality remains high. Preclinical studies support the efficacy of mesenchymal stem (stromal) cells (MSCs) in the treatment of lung injury. We aimed to test the safety of a single dose of allogeneic bone marrow-derived MSCs in patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS.

Methods: The STem cells for ARDS Treatment (START) trial was a multicentre, open-label, dose-escalation, phase 1 clinical trial. Patients were enrolled in the intensive care units at University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA, and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA, between July 8, 2013, and Jan 13, 2014. Patients were included if they had moderate-to-severe ARDS as defined by the acute onset of the need for positive pressure ventilation by an endotracheal or tracheal tube, a PaO2:FiO2 less than 200 mm Hg with at least 8 cm H2O positive end-expiratory airway pressure (PEEP), and bilateral infiltrates consistent with pulmonary oedema on frontal chest radiograph. The first three patients were treated with low dose MSCs (1 million cells/kg predicted bodyweight [PBW]), the next three patients received intermediate dose MSCs (5 million cells/kg PBW), and the final three patients received high dose MSCs (10 million cells/kg PBW). Primary outcomes included the incidence of prespecified infusion-associated events and serious adverse events. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01775774.

Findings: No prespecified infusion-associated events or treatment-related adverse events were reported in any of the nine patients. Serious adverse events were subsequently noted in three patients during the weeks after the infusion: one patient died on study day 9, one patient died on study day 31, and one patient was discovered to have multiple embolic infarcts of the spleen, kidneys, and brain that were age-indeterminate, but thought to have occurred before the MSC infusion based on MRI results. None of these severe adverse events were thought to be MSC-related.

Interpretation: A single intravenous infusion of allogeneic, bone marrow-derived human MSCs was well tolerated in nine patients with moderate to severe ARDS. Based on this phase 1 experience, we have proceeded to phase 2 testing of MSCs for moderate to severe ARDS with a primary focus on safety and secondary outcomes including respiratory, systemic, and biological endpoints.

Funding: The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Respiratory and Hemodynamic Parameters During and Post-MSC Infusion
Mean (+/- SD) values for each dosing group for (A) heart rate (beats per minute), (B) mean arterial pressure (mmHg), and (C) arterial oxygen saturation as measured by pulse oximeter (SpO2)(%) at baseline, one, four, and six hours from start of MSC infusion.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Lung Injury Score
Mean (+/- SD) lung injury score (LIS) for each dosing group at basleline, six hours from start of MSC infusion, and study days one, two, and three. The LIS is calculated from four variables: (1) number of affected quadrants on chest radiograph; (2) severity of hypoxia as measured by PaO2/FIO2 ratio; (3) level of PEEP; and (4) the static compliance of respiratory system.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score
Mean (+/- SD) SOFA score for each dosing group at basleline, six hours from start of MSC infusion, and study days one, two, and three. The SOFA score quantifies the severity of organ dysfunction in six systems (respiratory, coagulation, hepatic, cardiovascular, renal, and neurologic), and predicts outcomes in critically ill patients.,

Comment in

References

    1. Matthay MA, Ware LB, Zimmerman GA. The acute respiratory distress syndrome. J Clin Invest. 2012;122:2731–40. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Silversides JA, Ferguson ND. Clinical review: Acute respiratory distress syndrome-clinical ventilator management and adjunct therapy. Crit Care. 2012;17:225. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1301–1308. - PubMed
    1. Wiedemann HP, Wheeler AP, Bernard GR, et al. Comparison of two fluid-management strategies in acute lung injury. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:2564–2575. - PubMed
    1. Papazian L, Forel JM, Gacouin A, et al. Neuromuscular blockers in early acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:1107–1116. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data