Clinic staff attitudes towards the use of mHealth technology to conduct perinatal depression screenings: a qualitative study
- PMID: 25535280
- PMCID: PMC7340322
- DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmu083
Clinic staff attitudes towards the use of mHealth technology to conduct perinatal depression screenings: a qualitative study
Abstract
Background: The use of mHealth technology is an innovative approach for screening low-income mothers for depression. Past studies show that the use of technology removes barriers such as literacy issues, language challenges, concerns about privacy and lack of transportation and can also increase reliability. However, little is known about staff attitudes and perceptions towards using mHealth technology for screening low-income women for depression in clinics.
Methods: Four focus groups were conducted with staff members in a supplemental nutrition program for women, infants and children located in a public health clinic. A semi-structured focus group interview guide was used to examine staff perceptions related to depression screening with tablet technology. All interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was used to analyse all focus group data.
Results: Three major benefits and two major barriers were found. The benefits of using technology for perinatal depression screenings were reduction of literacy and language barriers, reduction of redundancy and errors and increased privacy for clients. The barriers were increased network issues and responsibility for technology, which included fear of the devices being lost, stolen or broken.
Implications: Before implementing mHealth tablet technology for depression screening in a public health clinic, it is important to address the concerns of staff members to make the transition more effective. This study provides timely information on staff-perceived benefits and barriers when implementing mHealth technology in a public health setting.
Keywords: Depression screening; WIC.; mHealth technology; perinatal; public health clinic.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Similar articles
-
Perinatal depression screening in a Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) program: perception of feasibility and acceptability among a multidisciplinary staff.Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2015 Jul-Aug;37(4):305-9. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2015.03.008. Epub 2015 Mar 20. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2015. PMID: 25858684
-
Implementing innovative evidence-based perinatal mental health screening for women of refugee background.Women Birth. 2020 May;33(3):e245-e255. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2019.05.007. Epub 2019 Jun 8. Women Birth. 2020. PMID: 31182352
-
WIC Staff Views and Perceptions on the Relationship between Food Insecurity and Perinatal Depression.Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Dec 26;11(1):68. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11010068. Healthcare (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36611527 Free PMC article.
-
Perceptions and Attitudes Toward Mobile Health in Development of an Exclusive Breastfeeding Tool: Focus Group Study With Caregivers and Health Promoters in the Dominican Republic.JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2020 Aug 21;3(2):e20312. doi: 10.2196/20312. JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2020. PMID: 32821063 Free PMC article.
-
Perinatal Depression in Low-Income Women: A Literature Review and Innovative Screening Approach.Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2020 Jan 7;22(1):1. doi: 10.1007/s11920-019-1126-9. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2020. PMID: 31912372 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Tablet computers for implementing NICE antenatal mental health guidelines: protocol of a feasibility study.BMJ Open. 2016 Jan 22;6(1):e009930. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009930. BMJ Open. 2016. PMID: 26801468 Free PMC article.
-
Mobile Based mhGAP-IG Depression Screening in Kenya.Community Ment Health J. 2018 Jan;54(1):84-91. doi: 10.1007/s10597-016-0072-9. Epub 2016 Nov 30. Community Ment Health J. 2018. PMID: 27900652
-
Implementation of depression screening in antenatal clinics through tablet computers: results of a feasibility study.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 May 10;17(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0459-8. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017. PMID: 28490353 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The acceptability of implementing patient-reported measures in routine maternity care: A systematic review.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2023 Apr;102(4):406-419. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14506. Epub 2023 Jan 16. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2023. PMID: 36647292 Free PMC article.
-
A Systematic Review of Technology-Based Prevention and Treatment Interventions for Perinatal Depression and Anxiety in Latina and African American Women.Matern Child Health J. 2021 Feb;25(2):268-281. doi: 10.1007/s10995-020-03028-9. Epub 2021 Jan 3. Matern Child Health J. 2021. PMID: 33389589
References
-
- Bennett HA, Einarson A, Taddio A, et al. Prevalence of depression during pregnancy: systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103: 698–709. - PubMed
-
- Sheeder J, Kabir K, Stafford B. Screening for postpartum depression at well-child visits: is once enough during the first 6 months of life? Pediatrics 2009; 123: e982–8. - PubMed
-
- Kim H, Bracha Y, Tipnis A. Automated depression screening in disadvantaged pregnant women in an urban obstetric clinic. Arch Womens Ment Health 2007; 10: 163–9. - PubMed
-
- Kim H, Geppert J, Quan T, et al. Screening for postpartum depression among low-income mothers using an interactive voice response system. Matern Child Health J 2012; 16: 921–8. - PubMed
-
- Paulson JF, Keefe HA, Leiferman JA. Early parental depression and child language development. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2009; 50: 254–62. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous