Bystander effects and radiotherapy
- PMID: 25535579
- PMCID: PMC4268598
- DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2014.08.004
Bystander effects and radiotherapy
Abstract
Radiation-induced bystander effects are defined as biological effects expressed after irradiation by cells whose nuclei have not been directly irradiated. These effects include DNA damage, chromosomal instability, mutation, and apoptosis. There is considerable evidence that ionizing radiation affects cells located near the site of irradiation, which respond individually and collectively as part of a large interconnected web. These bystander signals can alter the dynamic equilibrium between proliferation, apoptosis, quiescence or differentiation. The aim of this review is to examine the most important biological effects of this phenomenon with regard to areas of major interest in radiotherapy. Such aspects include radiation-induced bystander effects during the cell cycle under hypoxic conditions when administering fractionated modalities or combined radio-chemotherapy. Other relevant aspects include individual variation and genetics in toxicity of bystander factors and normal tissue collateral damage. In advanced radiotherapy techniques, such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), the high degree of dose conformity to the target volume reduces the dose and, therefore, the risk of complications, to normal tissues. However, significant doses can accumulate out-of-field due to photon scattering and this may impact cellular response in these regions. Protons may offer a solution to reduce out-of-field doses. The bystander effect has numerous associated phenomena, including adaptive response, genomic instability, and abscopal effects. Also, the bystander effect can influence radiation protection and oxidative stress. It is essential that we understand the mechanisms underlying the bystander effect in order to more accurately assess radiation risk and to evaluate protocols for cancer radiotherapy.
Keywords: Adaptive response; Bystander effect; Fractionated radiotherapy; IMRT; Radiotherapy.
Figures


Similar articles
-
[Radiation-induced bystander effect: the important part of ionizing radiation response. Potential clinical implications].Postepy Hig Med Dosw (Online). 2009 Aug 18;63:377-88. Postepy Hig Med Dosw (Online). 2009. PMID: 19724078 Review. Polish.
-
Radiotherapy and the potential exploitation of bystander effects.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Feb 1;58(2):575-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.09.038. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004. PMID: 14751530 Review.
-
Cell survival and DNA damage in normal prostate cells irradiated out-of-field.Radiat Res. 2014 Nov;182(5):499-506. doi: 10.1667/RR13777.1. Epub 2014 Oct 31. Radiat Res. 2014. PMID: 25361398
-
Ionizing radiation-induced bystander effects, potential targets for modulation of radiotherapy.Eur J Pharmacol. 2009 Dec 25;625(1-3):156-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2009.07.028. Epub 2009 Oct 14. Eur J Pharmacol. 2009. PMID: 19835860 Review.
-
Novel stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)-based partial tumor irradiation targeting hypoxic segment of bulky tumors (SBRT-PATHY): improvement of the radiotherapy outcome by exploiting the bystander and abscopal effects.Radiat Oncol. 2019 Jan 29;14(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s13014-019-1227-y. Radiat Oncol. 2019. PMID: 30696472 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Enhancing radiotherapy for melanoma: the promise of high-Z metal nanoparticles in radiosensitization.Nanomedicine (Lond). 2024;19(28):2391-2411. doi: 10.1080/17435889.2024.2403325. Epub 2024 Oct 9. Nanomedicine (Lond). 2024. PMID: 39382020 Review.
-
Secondary malignancy following radiotherapy for thyroid eye disease.Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2016 May-Jun;21(3):156-61. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2016.01.001. Epub 2016 Feb 8. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2016. PMID: 27601944 Free PMC article.
-
Non-homologous end joining induced alterations in DNA methylation: A source of permanent epigenetic change.Oncotarget. 2017 Jun 20;8(25):40359-40372. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.16122. Oncotarget. 2017. PMID: 28423717 Free PMC article.
-
The Cytokinesis-Block Micronucleus Assay on Human Isolated Fresh and Cryopreserved Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells.J Pers Med. 2020 Sep 14;10(3):125. doi: 10.3390/jpm10030125. J Pers Med. 2020. PMID: 32937746 Free PMC article.
-
Targeted Radionuclide Therapy with Low and High-Dose Lutetium-177-Labeled Single Domain Antibodies Induces Distinct Immune Signatures in a Mouse Melanoma Model.Mol Cancer Ther. 2022 Jul 5;21(7):1136-1148. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-21-0791. Mol Cancer Ther. 2022. PMID: 35499391 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Brooks A.L., Retherford J.C., McClellan R.O. Effect of 239PuO2 particle number and size on the frequency and distribution of chromosome aberration in the liver of the Chinese hamster. Radiat Res. 1974;59:693–709. - PubMed
-
- Watson G.E., Lorimore S.A., Macdonald D.A., Wright E.G. Chromosomal instability in unirradiated cells induced in vivo by a bystander effect of radiation. Cancer Res. 2000;60:5608–5611. - PubMed
-
- Short S.C., Woodcock M., Marples B. Effects of cell cycle phase on low-dose hyper-radiosensitivity. Int J Radiat Biol. 2003;79:99–105. - PubMed
-
- Marples B., Collis S.J. Low-dose hyper-radiosensitivity: past, present, and future. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;70:1310–1318. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources