What pharmacy practitioners need to know about ethics in scientific publishing
- PMID: 25535618
- PMCID: PMC4262856
- DOI: 10.4103/2279-042X.145356
What pharmacy practitioners need to know about ethics in scientific publishing
Abstract
Pharmacy practice is an ever-changing science and profession. We are witnessing many advancement of pharmacy technology, drug-related information and applied clinical pharmacy literature, which influence our every day's life. Thus, new knowledge generated by research and clinical experience widen the knowledge; change the understanding of drugs and their application in therapeutics and every days life. Thus, policy makers, pharmacists, clinicians and researchers must evaluate and use the information existing in the literature to implement in their healthcare delivery. This paper is prepared for pharmacy researchers and pharmacy students and analyzes the major principles of ethical conduct in general science and also closely related topics on ghost authorship, conflict of interest, assigning co-authorship, redundant/repetitive and duplicate publication. Furthermore, the paper provides an insight into fabrication and falsification of data, as the most common form of scientific fraud. Scientific misconduct goes against everything that normal scientific method wants to reach for and pharmacy practitioners as one the first line available health care professionals all round the world should be enough aware of its importance and details when they want to evaluate the medical and pharmaceutical literature and deliver unbiased and ethically published knowledge of drugs both for the research or during consultations for patients care.
Keywords: Authorship; bioethical issues; conflict of interest; duplicate publication; plagiarism.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
Science ethics education part II: changes in attitude toward scientific fraud among medical researchers after a short course in science ethics.J BUON. 2012 Apr-Jun;17(2):391-5. J BUON. 2012. PMID: 22740224
-
Ethical dilemmas in scientific publication: pitfalls and solutions for editors.Rev Saude Publica. 2006 Aug;40 Spec no.:24-9. doi: 10.1590/s0034-89102006000400004. Rev Saude Publica. 2006. PMID: 16924299
-
[Good practices and ethical principles: as necessary as ever].Rev Gastroenterol Peru. 2018 Jul-Sep;38(3):306-309. Rev Gastroenterol Peru. 2018. PMID: 30540738 Spanish.
-
Ethics and scientific publication.Adv Physiol Educ. 2005 Jun;29(2):59-74. doi: 10.1152/advan.00056.2004. Adv Physiol Educ. 2005. PMID: 15905149 Review.
-
Misconduct by researchers and authors.Gac Sanit. 2007 Nov-Dec;21(6):492-9. doi: 10.1157/13112245. Gac Sanit. 2007. PMID: 18001665 Review.
Cited by
-
How Far Goes the Un-ethic of the Authors Who Submit the Articles to the Journals, Or, Better to Say, Their "Scientific Insolence"?Acta Inform Med. 2023 Jun;31(2):154-158. doi: 10.5455/aim.2023.31.154-158. Acta Inform Med. 2023. PMID: 37711490 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Assessment of satisfaction of attendees of healthcare centers in Jordan with community pharmacy services of pharmacies they usually use.PLoS One. 2024 Jul 22;19(7):e0305991. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305991. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 39038057 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Talbert RL. Ethics in clinical pharmacy practice and research: An introduction. Pharmacotherapy. 1993;13:521. - PubMed
-
- Miederhoff PA, Olin BR, LeFevre J. Ethics education for clinical pharmacy practice. Drug Intell Clin Pharm. 1980;14:537–9. - PubMed
-
- Yeager AL. On Hippocrates. Either help or do not harm the patient. BMJ. 2002;325:496. - PubMed
-
- Sims JM. A brief review of the Belmont report. Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2010;29:173–4. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources