Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Feb 3;112(3):562-6.
doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.643. Epub 2014 Dec 23.

Enthusiasm for cancer screening in Great Britain: a general population survey

J Waller  1 , K Osborne  2 , J Wardle  1
Affiliations

Enthusiasm for cancer screening in Great Britain: a general population survey

J Waller et al. Br J Cancer. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Background: With growing concerns about risk of harm from cancer screening, particularly from overdiagnosis, this study aimed to assess public attitudes to cancer screening in Great Britain.

Methods: We used a population-based survey to assess attitudes to cancer screening, screening history and demographic characteristics, in men and women aged 50-80 years. Data were collected using face-to-face computer-assisted interviews in 2012.

Results: In our sample of 2024, attitudes to cancer screening were overwhelmingly positive with almost 90% believing that screening is 'almost always a good idea' and 49% saying they would be tested for cancer even if it was untreatable. Attitudes were particularly positive among those who had previously taken part in breast or colorectal screening.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that attitudes to cancer screening are very positive in Great Britain. Widespread enthusiasm for cancer screening may hamper attempts to encourage a greater appreciation of the limitations and potential harms of screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Informed Choice about Cancer Screening (2014) http://www.informedchoiceaboutcancerscreening.org/ (accessed 5 March 2014).
    1. Arkes HR, Gaissmaier W (2012) Psychological research and the prostate-cancer screening controversy. Psychol Sci 23(6): 547–553. - PubMed
    1. Brawley O, Byers T, Chen A, Pignone M, Ransohoff D, Schenk M, Smith R, Sox H, Thorson AG, Wender R (2011) New American Cancer Society process for creating trustworthy cancer screening guidelines. JAMA 306(22): 2495–2499. - PubMed
    1. Chapple A, Ziebland S, Hewitson P, McPherson A (2008) Why men in the United Kingdom still want the prostate specific antigen test. Qual Health Res 18(1): 56–64. - PubMed
    1. Entwistle VA, Carter SM, Trevena L, Flitcroft K, Irwig L, McCafferty K, Salked G (2008) Communicating about screening. BMJ 337: 789–791. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources