Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Feb 3;112(3):455-60.
doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.635. Epub 2014 Dec 23.

Prognostic relevance of the mitotic count and the amount of viable tumour after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for primary, localised, high-grade soft tissue sarcoma

Affiliations

Prognostic relevance of the mitotic count and the amount of viable tumour after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for primary, localised, high-grade soft tissue sarcoma

D Andreou et al. Br J Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: We sought to examine whether mitotic count (MC) and the amount of viable tumour (VT) following neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy (SC) for primary, localised, high-grade soft tissue sarcoma (STS) correlate with prognosis.

Methods: Retrospective analysis of 57 patients who underwent SC involving a combination of an anthracycline and an alkylating agent, followed by surgical resection between 2001 and 2011.

Results: The amount of VT after chemotherapy was significantly associated with disease-specific survival (DSS) and event-free survival (EFS). Patients with <10% VT had a DSS of 94% at 5 years, compared with 61% for patients with ⩾10% VT (P=0.033); EFS was 75%, compared with 48% (P=0.030). Patients with an MC of ⩾20/10 high power fields (HPF) after chemotherapy had a significantly lower DSS (33% vs 84% at 5 years, P<0.001) and EFS (40% vs 63% at 5 years, P=0.019) than patients with an MC of <20/10 HPF.

Conclusions: The MC and the amount of VT after neoadjuvant therapy for primary, localised, high-grade STS appear to correlate with prognosis. If these results are validated prospectively, then they could provide a rational for the design of neoadjuvant treatment modification/escalation studies, analogue to the EURAMOS-1 trial for bone sarcomas.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Disease-specific (A) and event-free survival (B) probability according to the amount of VT after treatment.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Disease-specific (A) and event-free survival (B) probability according to the MC after treatment.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Disease-specific (A) and event-free survival (B) probability according to the MC and the amount of VT.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Post-relapse survival probability according to the MC after chemotherapy.

References

    1. Bielack SS, Kempf-Bielack B, Delling G, Exner GU, Flege S, Helmke K, Kotz R, Salzer-Kuntschik M, Werner M, Winkelmann W, Zoubek A, Jurgens H, Winkler K. Prognostic factors in high-grade osteosarcoma of the extremities or trunk: an analysis of 1,702 patients treated on neoadjuvant cooperative osteosarcoma study group protocols. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20 (3:776–790. - PubMed
    1. Carrle D, Bielack SS. Current strategies of chemotherapy in osteosarcoma. Int Orthop. 2006;30 (6:445–451. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Clarkson P, Ferguson PC. Primary multidisciplinary management of extremity soft tissue sarcomas. CurrTreat Opt Oncol. 2004;5 (6:451–462. - PubMed
    1. Coindre JM, Nguyen BB, Goussot JF, de Mascarel I, Maree D, de Mascarel A, Trojani M. [Histological changes after chemotherapy of soft tissue sarcomas in the adult] Ann Pathol. 1985;5 (2:95–99. - PubMed
    1. Daugaard S, von Glabbeke M, Schiodt T, Mouridsen HT. Histopathological grade and response to chemotherapy in advanced soft tissue sarcomas. Eur J Cancer. 1993;29A (6:811–813. - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances