Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015;10(2):228-42.
doi: 10.1080/17441692.2014.986161. Epub 2014 Dec 24.

Sexual and reproductive health and rights in changing health systems

Affiliations
Free PMC article

Sexual and reproductive health and rights in changing health systems

Gita Sen et al. Glob Public Health. 2015.
Free PMC article

Abstract

Sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) are centrally important to health. However, there have been significant shortcomings in implementing SRHR to date. In the context of health systems reform and universal health coverage/care (UHC), this paper explores the following questions. What do these changes in health systems thinking mean for SRHR and gender equity in health in the context of renewed calls for increased investments in the health of women and girls? Can SRHR be integrated usefully into the call for UHC, and if so how? Can health systems reforms address the continuing sexual and reproductive ill health and violations of sexual and reproductive rights (SRR)? Conversely, can the attention to individual human rights that is intrinsic to the SRHR agenda and its continuing concerns about equality, quality and accountability provide impetus for strengthening the health system? The paper argues that achieving equity on the UHC path will require a combination of system improvements and services that benefit all, together with special attention to those whose needs are great and who are likely to fall behind in the politics of choice and voice (i.e., progressive universalism paying particular attention to gender inequalities).

Keywords: accountability; equity; quality of care; sexual and reproductive health and rights; universal health coverage/care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. UHC cube WHO (2010b).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ahmed S., Khan M. M. A maternal health voucher scheme: What have we learned from the demand-side financing scheme in Bangladesh? Health Policy and Planning. 2011;(1):25–32. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czq015. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alfonso Y. N., Bishai D., Bua J., Mutebi A., Mayora C., Ekirapa-Kiracho E. Cost-effectiveness analysis of a voucher scheme combined with obstetrical quality improvements: Quasi experimental results from Uganda. Health Policy and Planning. 2013 doi: 10.1093/heapol/czt100. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Balarajan Y., Selvaraj S., Subramanian S. V. Health care and equity in India. Lancet. 2011:505–515. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61894-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beyond 2015 The post-2015 development agenda: What is good for health equity? 2012 http://www.worldwewant2015.org/file/300161/download/325618 Retrieved from.
    1. Bradshaw S. From structural adjustment to social adjustment: A gendered analysis of conditional cash transfer programmes in Mexico and Nicaragua. Global Social Policy. 2008:188–207. doi: 10.1177/1468018108090638. - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources