Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2015 Feb;17(2):98-104.
doi: 10.1111/jch.12458. Epub 2014 Dec 24.

Olmesartan improves pulse wave velocity and lowers central systolic blood pressure and ambulatory blood pressure in patients with metabolic syndrome

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Olmesartan improves pulse wave velocity and lowers central systolic blood pressure and ambulatory blood pressure in patients with metabolic syndrome

Ulrike Raff et al. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2015 Feb.

Abstract

Ambulatory blood pressure (BP) and central systolic BP (cSBP) are superior to brachial office BP measurements in predicting cardiovascular end organ damage. The authors aimed to analyze the effect of olmesartan 80 mg (OLM 80) vs 20 mg (OLM 20) vs amlodipine 5 mg (AML 5) on central hemodymamics and ambulatory BP in patients with metabolic syndrome (MetS).In a double-blind, three-phase crossover study comprising 69 untreated patients with MetS defined by the Third Report of the Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults guidelines, the effects of OLM 80 on central hemodynamics (cSBP), central pulse pressure), pulse wave velocity (PWV), and 24-hour ambulatory BP were compared with OLM 20 and AML 5, given for 6 weeks each. In 69 patients (47 men, 22 women) (51.5±9.75 years), reduction in cSBP was the highest with OLM 80 and significantly greater than the reduction with AML 5 (-14.1 mm Hg vs -9.7 mm Hg, P=.0117). All three substances significantly reduced 24-hour ambulatory systolic (OLM 80 and OLM 20 P<.0001; AML 5 P=.0105). BP and 24-hour diastolic BP (OLM 80 and OLM 20 P<.0001; AML 5 P=.0126). PWV was significantly reduced by OLM 80 (-0.58 m/s, P=.0088) and by OLM 20 (-0.48 m/s, P=.0362) but not by AML 5 (-0.28 m/s, P=.2065). For PWV, no significant differences were detected between the three groups. OLM significantly improves arterial stiffness as demonstrated by the reduction in PWV and in cSBP. In addition, 24-hour ambulatory BP was reduced to a greater extent with OLM 80 than with AML 5.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Bar chart showing the reduction of 24‐hour systolic blood pressure (BP) and central systolic BP in the three groups (olmesartan 80 mg, olmesartan 20 mg, amlodipine 5 mg). Least‐squares means are given and P<.05 is considered statistically significant.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Bar chart showing the reduction of pulse pressure in the three groups (olmesartan 80 mg [OLM 80], olmesartan 20 mg [OLM 20], amlodipine 5 mg [AML 5]) (a). Bar chart showing the reduction of pulse wave velocity in the three groups (olmesartan 80 mg, olmesartan 20 mg, amlodipine 5 mg) (b). Least‐squares means are given and P<.05 is considered statistically significant.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Scatter blot showing the association of pulse wave velocity (PWV) with mean arterial pressure (MAP) (upper part). The regression equations are for OLM 80 mg: PWV = 0.0735 + 0.088*MAP; OLM 20: PWV = 1.095 + 0.077*MAP; AML: PWV = 4.448 + 0.042*MAP, and the change of PWV with the change in MAP (lower part) regression equation are for OLM 80: PWV = −0.134 + 0.033*MAP; OLM 20: PWV = −0.205 + 0.018*MAP; and AML: PWV = −0.141 + 0.0151*MAP). OLM 80 indicates olmesartan 80 mg; OLM 20, olmesartan 20 mg; AML, amlodipine.

Comment in

References

    1. Dekker JM, Girman C, Rhodes T, et al. Metabolic syndrome and 10‐year cardiovascular disease risk in the Hoorn study. Circulation. 2005;112:666–673. - PubMed
    1. Wang J, Ruotsalainen S, Moilanen L, et al. The metabolic syndrome predicts cardiovascular mortality: a 13‐year follow‐up study in elderly non‐diabetic Finns. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:857–864. - PubMed
    1. Miyashita Y, Saiki A, Endo K, et al. Effects of olmesartan, an angiotensin II receptor blocker, and amlodipine, a calcium channel blocker, on Cardio‐Ankle Vascular Index (CAVI) in type 2 diabetic patients with hypertension. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2009;16:621–626. - PubMed
    1. Smith RD, Yokoyama H, Averill DB, et al. Reversal of vascular hypertrophy in hypertensive patients through blockade of angiotensin II receptors. J Am Soc Hypertens. 2008;2:165–172. - PubMed
    1. Schiffrin EL. Effect of antihypertensive therapy on small artery structure in hypertensive patients. Hypertension. 1995;26:716–718. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms