Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jul;32(7):2229-40.
doi: 10.1007/s11095-014-1611-0. Epub 2014 Dec 24.

Measuring tissue back-pressure--in vivo injection forces during subcutaneous injection

Affiliations

Measuring tissue back-pressure--in vivo injection forces during subcutaneous injection

Andrea Allmendinger et al. Pharm Res. 2015 Jul.

Abstract

Purpose: Limited information is available on injection forces of parenterals representing the in vivo situation. Scope of the present study was to investigate the contribution of the subcutaneous (sc) tissue layer to injection forces during in vivo injection.

Methods: Göttingen minipigs received injections of isotonic dextran solutions (1-100 mPas) into the plica inguinalis using different injection rates and volumes (0.025-0.2 mL/s and 2.5 vs. 4.5 mL).

Results: The contribution of the sc back-pressure to injection forces was found to increase linearly with viscosity and injection rate ranging from 0.6 ± 0.5 N to 1.0 ± 0.4 N (1 mPas), 0.7 ± 0.2 N to 2.4 ± 1.9 N (10 mPas), and 1.8 ± 0.6 N to 4.7 ± 3.3 N (20 mPas) for injection rates of 0.025 to 0.2 mL/s, respectively. Variability increased with viscosity and injection rate. Values are average values from 10 randomized injections. A maximum of 12.9 N was reached for 20 mPas at 0.2 mL/s; 6.9 ± 0.3 N was determined for 100 mPas at 0.025 mL/s. No difference was found between injection volumes of 2.5 and 4.5 mL. The contribution of the tissue was differentiated from the contribution of the injection device and a local temperature effect. This effect was leading to warming of the (equilibrated) sample in the needle, therefore smaller injection forces than expected compensating tissue resistance to some parts.

Conclusions: When estimating injection forces representative for the in vivo situation, the contribution of the tissue has to be considered as well as local warming of the sample in the needle during injection.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2009 Mar 2;36(4-5):524-31 - PubMed
    1. Arzneimittelforschung. 2012 Sep;62(9):401-9 - PubMed
    1. J Control Release. 2006 Aug 28;114(2):230-41 - PubMed
    1. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods. 2010 Nov-Dec;62(3):196-220 - PubMed
    1. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2010 Oct 05;4:379-88 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources