Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Dec 4:5:1412.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01412. eCollection 2014.

The medium helps the message: Early sensitivity to auditory fluency in children's endorsement of statements

Affiliations

The medium helps the message: Early sensitivity to auditory fluency in children's endorsement of statements

Stéphane Bernard et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Recently, a growing number of studies have investigated the cues used by children to selectively accept testimony. In parallel, several studies with adults have shown that the fluency with which information is provided influences message evaluation: adults evaluate fluent information as more credible than dysfluent information. It is therefore plausible that the fluency of a message could also influence children's endorsement of statements. Three experiments were designed to test this hypothesis with 3- to 5-year-olds where the auditory fluency of a message was manipulated by adding different levels of noise to recorded statements. The results show that 4 and 5-year-old children, but not 3-year-olds, are more likely to endorse a fluent statement than a dysfluent one. The present study constitutes a first attempt to show that fluency, i.e., ease of processing, is recruited as a cue to guide epistemic decision in children. An interpretation of the age difference based on the way cues are processed by younger children is suggested.

Keywords: cognitive development; fluency; preschoolers; social learning; testimony selection; trust.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Vignettes for the ball story.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Percentage of fluent choices in each Experiment and in each age group (the chance line is at 0.50). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, one-sample t-test.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Excerpt of screen presentation for the auditory evaluation task (left) and for the reaction time task (right).

References

    1. Alter A. L., Oppenheimer D. M. (2009). Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 13 219–235 10.1177/1088868309341564 - DOI - PubMed
    1. American National Standards Institute. (2002). Acoustical Performance Criteria, Design Requirements, and Guidelines for Schools (Standard S12. 60–2002).
    1. Anderson S., Skoe E., Chandrasekaran B., Zecker S., Kraus N. (2010). Brainstem correlates of speech-in-noise perception in children. Hear. Res. 270 151–157 10.1016/j.heares.2010.08.001 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baum L. A., Danovitch J. H., Keil F. C. (2008). Children’s sensitivity to circular explanations. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 100 146–155 10.1016/j.jecp.2007.10.007 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Begg I. M., Anas A., Farinacci S. (1992). Dissociation of processes in belief: source recollection, statement familiarity, and the illusion of truth. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 121 446–458 10.1037/0096-3445.121.4.446 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources